Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 51 - 100 of 310

Collyer, Rosemary Mayers (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2014-03-20 )

… Declining a petition filed by [REDACTED] “to vacate, modify, or reaffirm” a Jan. 3, 2014 production order. … Opinion and Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring Production of …

Walton, Reggie B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2014-03-12 )

… Granting Mar. 11, 2014 motion for temporary relief from five-year data destruction rule pending resolution of preservation issues raised in _Jewel v. NSA_ and _First Unitarian Church v. NSA_. … Opinion and Order, In re …

Walton, Reggie B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2014-03-07 )

… Denying government motion for a second amendment to the Jan. 3, 2014 primary order approving §215 collection, seeking to retain telephony metadata beyond five years for purposes of pending civil litigation. … Opinion and …

Collyer, Rosemary Mayers (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2014-01-01 )

… Denying motion for disclosure of prior FISC decisions on the grounds that “neither FISA nor the …[FISC] Rules of Procedure…require, or provide for discretionary, disclosure of the Requested Opinions in the circumstances of …

Collyer, Rosemary Mayers (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2014-01-01 )

… Holding that the 2014 Directives meet the requirements of §702 and are otherwise lawful, including inter alia, that they are consistent with the Fourth Amendment as there is no “distinctive or heightened risk of the …

McLaughlin, Mary A. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2013-12-18 )

… Granting motion by the Center for National Security Studies to file an amicus brief on why §215 does not authorize bulk collection of telephony metadata records, and denying motions for reconsideration or en banc review, …

Walton, Reggie B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2013-12-13 )

… Holding that the Nov. 15, 2013 amended minimization procedures are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. § 1881a(d)-(e) and the Fourth Amendment. Order approving the minimization procedures pursuant to …

McLaughlin, Mary A. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2013-10-11 )

… Authorizing bulk metadata collection and agreeing with Judge Eagan’s July 2013 Mem. Op. in BR 13-109 that collection of bulk telephone metadata meets the §215 relevance standard and, under _Smith v. Maryland_, that the …

Saylor, F. Dennis (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2013-09-13 )

… Ruling on ACLU motion to release FISC opinions: motion denied with respect to records that are part of ongoing FOIA litigation; government ordered to conduct declassification review of other opinions. … Opinion and Order, …

Walton, Reggie B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2013-08-30 )

… Holding that the certifications included as part of the July 31, 2012 submission contain the required statutory elements and that the targeting and minimization procedures adopted for use in connection with those …

Eagan, Claire (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2013-08-29 )

… Granting the application for bulk telephony metadata collection, holding that “ _Smith v. Maryland_ compels the conclusion that there is no Fourth Amendment impediment to the collection,” comparing §215 to the Stored …

Walton, Reggie B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2013-06-12 )

… Finding that contrary to the Government’s argument in District Court, that FISC rules prevent the District Court from ordering disclosure of a FISC opinion if it is found to be subject to FOIA, the District Court has the …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2013-02-19 )

… Finding that the application submitted by the government in support of an FBI investigation of a USP meets the statutory First Amendment requirement as well as the language requiring that the tangible things sought are …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2012-09-25 )

… Noting that in 2011 “the government made a series of submissions to the Court disclosing that it had materially misrepresented the scope of NSA’s ‘upstream collection’ under §702 (and prior authorities including the …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2012-01-01 )

… Holding that the NSA’s amended minimization procedures used in this case, permitting the sharing of certain unminimized communications, are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. § 1881a(d)-(e) and with the Fourth …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2011-11-30 )

… Approving amended minimization procedures adopted to correct the statutory and constitutional deficiencies identified by the Court in its Oct. 3, 2011 Mem. Op. and restarting §702 upstream collection. … Memorandum Opinion …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2011-10-03 )

… Holding that the NSA misled the Court on the nature of §702 upstream collection, acquiring tens of thousands entirely domestic communications of USPs and that the minimization procedures failed on statutory and …

Scullin, Frederick J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2011-05-13 )

… Directing the government to destroy information obtained by unauthorized electronic surveillance. … Opinion and Order Requiring Destruction of Information Obtained by Unauthorized Electronic Surveillance, [REDACTED], Nos. …

Scullin, Frederick J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2010-12-10 )

… Ordering the government to submit further information regarding its proposed retention and use of the results of unauthorized surveillance. … Opinion and Order Regarding Fruits of Unauthorized Electronic Surveillance, …

McLaughlin, Mary A. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2010-01-01 )

… Holding that the targeting and minimization procedures used in this case are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. §§1881a(d)-(e) and with the Fourth Amendment, noting government noncompliance in relation to …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2010-01-01 )

… Holding that the targeting and minimization procedures used in this case are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. §§1881a(d)-(e) and with the Fourth Amendment. Order granting authorization for the targeting and …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2010-01-01 )

… Holding that the targeting and minimization procedures used in this case are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. §§1881a(d)-(e) and with the Fourth Amendment. Order granting authorization for the targeting and …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Granting in part and denying in part an application to engage in bulk Internet metadata collection and to query and use information previously obtained by NSA and noting, “the government acknowledges that …

Walton, Reggie B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2009-11-05 )

… Noting noncompliance of NSA sharing of information requirements (NSA had created an email distribution list with 189 analysts, only 53 of whom had the adequate training and guidance and to whom BR metadata query results …

McLaughlin, Mary A. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2012-05-18 )

… Holding that the minimization procedures for the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) and amendments to FBI procedures (which would permit the FBI to provide to NCTC information relating to international terrorism and …

McLaughlin, Mary A. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2009-04-07 )

… Holding §702 targeting and minimization procedures used in this case are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. §§1881a(d)-(e) and with the Fourth Amendment, noting that in 2008 the government reported …

Hogan, Thomas F. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2009-01-01 )

… Holding that the targeting and minimization procedures used in this case are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. §§1881a(d)-(e) and with the Fourth Amendment, recognizing that continued NSA noncompliance problems …

Hogan, Thomas F. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2009-01-01 )

… [Almost entirely consistent language and redactions to GID.C.00051 ( https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1052745 ), but with some slight differences] Holding that the targeting and minimization …

Collyer, Rosemary Mayers (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2019-04-11 )

… Order denying Thomas C. Goldstein’s motion for “appointment as amicus curiae and for leave to file an amicus curiae brief to assist the Court in deciding whether the appointment of Matthew Whitaker as Acting Attorney …

Walton, Reggie B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2008-12-12 )

… Concluding that call detail records are subject to production under 50 U.S.C.§1861, addressing tension with 18 U.S.C.§§2702-2703 (relevant provisions of Electronic Communications Privacy Act) … Supplemental Opinion, In re …

Vinson, C. Roge (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2008-12-18 )

… Finding that the circumstances of the case fall within the applicable standard to install and use pen register/trap and trace devices. Order authorizing the installation and use of pen register and tap and trace devices …

McLaughlin, Mary A. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2008-01-01 )

… Holding §702 targeting and minimization procedures used in this case are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. §§1881a(d)-(e) and with the Fourth Amendment, referencing a Sept. 4, 2008 Memorandum Opinion and …

McLaughlin, Mary A. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2008-09-04 )

… Holding that the targeting and minimization procedures at issue are consistent with the 4th Amendment and the government is not require to obtain a warrant for acquisitions pursuant to the procedures in question. … …

McLaughlin, Mary A. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2008-08-27 )

… Denying ACLU’s motion (a) to be notified of the caption and briefing schedule for any proceedings under §702(i) in which the Court would consider legal questions relating to the scope, meaning, and constitutionality of the …

Walton, Reggie B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2008-04-25 )

… Holding that the court retained jurisdiction despite the lapse of the PAA, that the directives served on Yahoo! met the PAA statutory requirements and the Fourth Amendment, and that service providers can bring Fourth …

Kollar-Kotelly, Colleen (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2008-01-15 )

… Considering DNI/AG certification related to Yahoo! PRISM case under a “clearly erroneous” standard of review; focuses on the PAA. … Memorandum Opinion and Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00023 (FISA Ct. Jan. 15, …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2007-12-11 )

… Finding ACLU motion within FISC’s jurisdiction, denying motion for release of Court orders and government pleadings regarding §702 on common law and First Amendment right of access grounds because FISC proceedings …

Vinson, C. Roge (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2007-08-02 )

… Responding to an application to establish an early warning system to alert the government to the presence of FPs/AFPs in the United States, noting that the new procedures “would enable the Government to direct electronic …

Vinson, C. Roge (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2007-04-03 )

… Rejecting the definition of “facility” from the Jan. 10, 2007 foreign content order and finding that probable cause findings for selectors must be made by FISC, not the NSA. … Order and Memorandum Opinion, In re …

Kollar-Kotelly, Colleen (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Holding bulk Internet metadata collection is consistent with 50 U.S.C. §§1841-1846, that the restrictions on retention, accessing, use, and dissemination of the information satisfies the requirements of 50 …

Lamberth, Royce (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2002-05-17 )

… Holding that minimization procedures must prevent prosecutors from directing foreign intelligence searches (re-building the wall). … In re All Matters Submitted to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 218 F. Supp. 2d …

… Holding that the electronic search provisions of the 1978 FISA do not authorize FISC to issue orders for search of real property. … In re Application of the United States for an Order Authorizing the Physical Search of …

Davis, Michael J. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Setting out the Court’s reasons for adding clarification for its jurisdiction and scope of its authorization into the surveillance order language. Order granting the application of the United States to …

Hogan, Thomas F. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Holding that the particular type of surveillance requested constitutes “electronic surveillance” as defined in FISA. … Memorandum Opinion, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00149 (FISA Ct.) (Hogan, J.) … …

Broomfield, Robert C. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … [Labeled as an opinion but almost entirely redacted] … Opinion, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00146 (FISA Ct.) (Broomfield, J.) … All withheld information exempt under b(1), b(3) and b(7)(E) except as …

Kollar-Kotelly, Colleen (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Heavily redacted; appears to be reporting noncompliance (“For the first time, on the evening of [REDACTED] [DOJ] orally informed this Judge that for weeks [REDACTED].” *2.* Also notes “The Court is without …

Baker, Harold A. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2004-01-01 )

… Denying in part and granting in part the government’s Motion for Reconsideration; [procedural history almost entirely redacted]; holding that the practices at issue are not moot thus presenting the court with a live issue; …

Feldman, Martin L.C. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Government application requesting authorization for electronic surveillance and physical search. Court’s conclusion is redacted. … Memorandum Opinion, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00139 (FISA Ct.) …

Hogan, Thomas F. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Order and opinion finding that the government exceeded the scope of the authorization of the Court’s earlier opinion and conducted unauthorized surveillance. … Opinion and Order, [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Responding to government request for clarification in previous Mem. Op., which limited collection authority for several categories of metadata collection under PR/TT. Amended primary order narrowing the …

Date Created

Date Issued