Search Full Text

… Finding that “FISA procedures on their face satisfy the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement, and that FISA was properly implemented in this case.” 540 F. Supp. at 1314. “FISA procedures for reviewing the legality of a …

… Holding that “the FISA application established probable cause to believe that Global Relief and the executive director were agents of a foreign power, as that term is defined for FISA purposes, at the time the search was …

… Finding that the “lack of FISA procedures for physical searches” did not “render the physical search [in this case] unreasonable.” 435 F. Supp. 2d at 792. View document: …

… “FISA electronic surveillance at issue was lawfully authorized and legally conducted.” 2010 WL 4705159, at *2. “Because disclosure of the materials is unnecessary for the Court to determine the legality of the collection, …

… Reaffirming that “FISA is facially constitutional, that its requirements were met in this case, and that defendant has not made the requisite showing to warrant discovery of the FISA applications and orders.” 2012 WL …

… Denying motioned for a new trial “because admitting evidence obtained under [FISA] violated the Fourth Amendment.” 2012 WL 3779107, at *2. Defendant also alleged FISA was unconstitutional. Id. Court rejected these …

… Denying “Defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained by the government pursuant to FISA.” 2014 WL 4804215, at *5. … United States v. Fishenko, No. 12 CV 626(SJ), 2014 WL 4804215 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2014). … UNITED …

… Denying defendant’s motion to “suppress evidence obtained or derived from surveillance conducted pursuant to Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act.” 2016 WL 1029500, at *1. … United States v. Hasbajrami, 11-CR-623 (JG), …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to release the Unredacted Opinion to his security cleared counsel.” 2017 WL 3610595, at *1. … United States v. Hasbajrami, No. 11-cr-623 (DLI), 2017 WL 3610595 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2017). … UNITED …

… After receiving notice pursuant to 50 U.S.C. §§ 1806(c) and 1825(d) that the Government would offer into evidence information derived from FISA surveillance, the defendant moved to disclose FISA-related materials. The …

… The Court denied the defendants’ motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA surveillance, finding that the “electronic surveillance was lawfully authorized and conducted.” 553 F. Supp. at 1200. The Court further found that …

… The Court denied motion to suppress FISA-acquired evidence, “based on a determination, after an extensive in camera review of the classified materials submitted to the FISA Court, that there was probable cause to believe …