Search Full Text

… Finding that “the district court did not err when it denied the defendants’ motion to suppress” FISA obtained evidence. 529 F.3d at 993. View document: https://perma.cc/QAN2-A9B7 … United States v. Campa, 529 F.3d 980 …

… Finding that disclosure of FISA materials to defendant was “not ‘necessary’ to assess the legality of the searches or surveillance.” 868 F.3d at 955. Defendant’s “confrontation rights were not violated [] simply because …

… Finding that “FISA procedures on their face satisfy the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement, and that FISA was properly implemented in this case.” 540 F. Supp. at 1314. “FISA procedures for reviewing the legality of a …

… Reaffirming that “FISA is facially constitutional, that its requirements were met in this case, and that defendant has not made the requisite showing to warrant discovery of the FISA applications and orders.” 2012 WL …

… Denying “Defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained by the government pursuant to FISA.” 2014 WL 4804215, at *5. … United States v. Fishenko, No. 12 CV 626(SJ), 2014 WL 4804215 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2014). … UNITED …

… Denying defendant’s motion to “suppress evidence obtained or derived from surveillance conducted pursuant to Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act.” 2016 WL 1029500, at *1. … United States v. Hasbajrami, 11-CR-623 (JG), …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to release the Unredacted Opinion to his security cleared counsel.” 2017 WL 3610595, at *1. … United States v. Hasbajrami, No. 11-cr-623 (DLI), 2017 WL 3610595 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2017). … UNITED …

… Dismissing without prejudice as frivolous a suit alleging FISA surveillance. … May v. Bellenger, No. 19-cv-0101 (MHH-TMP), 2019 WL 1877594 (N.D. Ala. Mar. 28, 2019). … Case 2:19-cv-00101-MHH-TMP Document 12 Filed 03/28/19 …

… Defendant argued that the evidence should be suppressed on the grounds that the surveillance was imposed not to seek foreign intelligence information, but to conduct a criminal investigation. 827 F.2d at 1462. The Court …

… The Court denied the defendants’ motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA surveillance, finding that the “electronic surveillance was lawfully authorized and conducted.” 553 F. Supp. at 1200. The Court further found that …