Search Full Text

… Finding that “FISA procedures on their face satisfy the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement, and that FISA was properly implemented in this case.” 540 F. Supp. at 1314. “FISA procedures for reviewing the legality of a …

… [Section A of opinion discusses constitutionality of FISA] View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7493596004227221328&q=634+… ] … Matter of Kevork, 634 F. Supp. 1002 (C.D. Cal. 1985). … Matter of …

… “The fact that the government has included misstatements and critical omissions in other FISA applications not at issue here cannot justify disclosure in this case. Without some indication that the congressionally mandated …

… Denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to FISA. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 888. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10414221597771304627&q=838… … United States v. Mahamud, 838 F. …

… “FISA is constitutional both on its face and in its application to this case.” 1985 WL 5970, at *2. FISA survives defendant’s Fourth Amendment challenge. Id. … United States v. Hovsepian, No. CR 82–917 MRP, 1985 WL 5970 …

… Granting the DOJ and the FBI’s motion “that they are entitled to judgment on the pleadings on [defendant’s] FISA claim because they are not ‘persons’ against whom FISA's civil liability provision provides a cause of …

… Denying defendant’s motion “to compel production of the FISA applications, orders, and related material” and “suppression of all information obtained from the FISA surveillance.” 2006 WL 8436820, at *1. … United States v. …

… Reaffirming that “FISA is facially constitutional, that its requirements were met in this case, and that defendant has not made the requisite showing to warrant discovery of the FISA applications and orders.” 2012 WL …

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …

… Denying “Defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained by the government pursuant to FISA.” 2014 WL 4804215, at *5. … United States v. Fishenko, No. 12 CV 626(SJ), 2014 WL 4804215 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2014). … UNITED …

… Denying defendant’s motion to “suppress evidence obtained or derived from surveillance conducted pursuant to Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act.” 2016 WL 1029500, at *1. … United States v. Hasbajrami, 11-CR-623 (JG), …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to release the Unredacted Opinion to his security cleared counsel.” 2017 WL 3610595, at *1. … United States v. Hasbajrami, No. 11-cr-623 (DLI), 2017 WL 3610595 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2017). … UNITED …

… The Court denied the defendants’ motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA surveillance, finding that the “electronic surveillance was lawfully authorized and conducted.” 553 F. Supp. at 1200. The Court further found that …