Search Full Text

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… The Court denied the defendants’ motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA surveillance, finding that the “electronic surveillance was lawfully authorized and conducted.” 553 F. Supp. at 1200. The Court further found that …

… The Court denied motion to suppress FISA-acquired evidence, “based on a determination, after an extensive in camera review of the classified materials submitted to the FISA Court, that there was probable cause to believe …