Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Glawe, David ( 2020-02-24 )

… Department of Homeland Security ICPG 107.1 Unmasking Guidelines (Feb. 24, 2020) … Department of Homeland Security OHS Directives System Instruction Number: 264-01-010 Revision Number: 00 Issue Date: 2/24/2020 REQUESTS FOR …

Sifton, Charles (United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 1982-12-01 )

… The Court denied the defendants’ motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA surveillance, finding that the “electronic surveillance was lawfully authorized and conducted.” 553 F. Supp. at 1200. The Court further found that …

Date Created

Date Issued