Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 5 of 5

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ( Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Effective November 1, 2010 Rule Page Title I. Scope of Rules; Amendment 1. Scope of Rules …

Center for Democracy & Technology ( 2007-09-17 )

… CDT argues (contra the Executive branch) that relying on minimization will not address the deficiencies in the PAA: (a) even if it meant that the gov’t would discard all USP communications intercepted (which it doesn’t), …

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2017-11-09 )

… Holding that ACLU and Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic have standing, having sufficiently alleged the invasion of a legally cognizable interest as necessary to establish an injury-in-fact. … Opinion, In re …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Date Created

Date Issued