Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 7 of 7

Boyle, Jane J. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, 2019-04-15 )

… Denying motion in criminal material support prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B to suppress and disclose FISA-related material. … United States v. Rahim, No. 3:17-CR-0169-B, 2019 WL 1595682 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2019). … …

United States National Security Agency/Central Security Service ( 2019-12-12 )

… Office of the Inspector Gen., NSA/CSS, Special Study of the NSA Controls to Comply with Signals Intelligence Retention Requirements (Dec. 12, 2019) … NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE INSPECTOR GENERAL …

United States National Security Agency/Central Security Service ( 2016-01-01 )

… Office of the Inspector Gen., NSA/CSS, Report on the Special Study of NSA Controls to Comply with the FISA Amendments Act §§704 and 705(b) Targeting and Minimization Procedures, ST-15-0002 (Jan. 7, 2016) … MMaay y1 01,0 2, …

United States National Security Agency/Central Security Service ( 2015-01-01 )

… Office of Inspector Gen., NSA/CSS, Final Report of the Audit on the FISA Amendments Act § 702 Detasking Requirements, AU-10-0023 (Nov. 24, 2010) … Office of Inspector Gen., NSA/CSS, Report on the Special Study: Assessment …

United States National Security Agency/Central Security Service ( 2008-01-01 )

… Office of Inspector Gen., NSA/CSS, Report on the Assessment of Management Controls to Implement the Protect America Act (PAA) of 2007, ST-08-0001 (Apr. 7, 2008) … DOCID: 42 48832 ST.. -0.(18 001 OFFICE OF lHE INSPECfOR …

United States National Security Agency/Central Security Service ( Date Redacted )

… Date Redacted … Office of the Inspector Gen., NSA/CSS, Report on the Special Study of NSA’s Purge of Pen Register and Trap and Trace Bulk Metadata (redacted date, released Nov. 10, 2015) … DOCID: 4248814 TOP …

Sifton, Charles (United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 1982-12-01 )

… The Court denied the defendants’ motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA surveillance, finding that the “electronic surveillance was lawfully authorized and conducted.” 553 F. Supp. at 1200. The Court further found that …

Date Created

Date Issued