Official Reports and Judicial Correspondence

USE OF FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AUTHORITIES:
OFFICIAL REPORTS

Related to the Use of Foreign Intelligence Authorities

Laura K. Donohue

While some documents remain classified or partially-redacted, myriad reports are available on the government’s use of foreign intelligence authorities. This document distinguishes between statutorily-required and special reports and provides links to the documents.

A. STATUTORILY-REQUIRED

  1. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC)

    50 U.S.C. § 1803(g)(2) requires FISC to transmit its rules and procedures to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), and the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.

    The Courts’ rules of procedure include :

  2. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

    50 U.S.C. § 1873(a) requires the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to publish:

    1. the number of applications or certifications for orders submitted under §§ 1805, 1824, 1842, 1861, 1881a, 1881b, 188c;
    2. the number of such orders granted under each of those sections;
    3. the number of orders modified under each of those sections;
    4. the number of applications or certifications denied under each of those sections;
    5. the number of appointments of an individual to serve as amicus curiae under section § 1803, including the name of each individual appointed to serve as amicus curiae; and
    6. the number of findings issued under §1803(i) that such appointment is not appropriate.

    The following reports have been issued to date :

    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2022 (April 28, 2023). [U.S. Courts] [ Local ]
    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2021 (April 27, 2022). [U.S. Courts] [Perma]
    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2020, (July 16, 2021) (amending earlier report to reflect the additional appointment of an amicus). [U.S. Courts] [ Local ]

    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2020 (Apr. 29, 2021). [ Local ]

      Note: the U.S. Courts deleted the link to the April 2021 Report, replacing it with the July 2021 Report; however, the document as issued in April 2021 is still available in the Foreign Intelligence Collection.

    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2020 (2021). [U.S. Courts] [ Local ]
    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2019 (2020). [U.S. Courts] [ Local ]
    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2018 (2019). [U.S. Courts] [ Local ]
    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2017 (2018). [U.S. Courts] [ Local ]
    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2016 (2017). [U.S. Courts] [ Local ]
    • Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for 2015 (2016). [U.S. Courts] [ Local ]
  3. Director of National Intelligence

    1. Cyclical Reporting

      Under the National Security Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. § 404d), the President is required to submit a report to HPSCI and SSCI on U.S. intelligence requirements and budget requires to facilitate the committees’ assessment of IC’s activities over the previous year and to help to develop a mission and a budget for the coming fiscal year. The report is submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.

      • 2006 Annual Report of the U.S. Intelligence Community (2007)[ODNI] [ Local ]

      Starting in 2014, the DNI began annually issuing a Statistical Transparency Report Regarding Use of National Security Authorities. In 2015, the USA FREEDOM Act codified at 50 U.S.C. § 1873(b) a requirement that DNI annually provide details on:

      1. the number of individualized electronic surveillance and physical search orders;
      2. the number of § 702 orders and a good faith estimate of queries and searches of information collected under § 702;
      3. the number of PRTT orders;
      4. the number of orders to produce tangible things; and
      5. the number of NSLs.

      The following reports have been issued to date :

      • Annual Statistical Transparency Report Regarding the Intelligence Community’s Use of National Security Surveillance Authorities: Calendar year 2022 (2023).[ODNI] [ Local ]
      • Annual Statistical Transparency Report Regarding the Intelligence Community’s Use of National Security Surveillance Authorities: Calendar year 2021 (2022).[ODNI] [Perma]
      • Annual Statistical Transparency Report Regarding the Intelligence Community's Use of National Security Surveillance Authorities: Calendar Year 2020 (2021). [ODNI] [ Local ]
      • Statistical Transparency Report Regarding the Use of National Security Authorities: Calendar Year 2019 (2020). [ODNI] [ Local ]
      • Statistical Transparency Report Regarding Use of National Security Authorities: Calendar Year 2018 (2019). [ODNI] [ Local ]
      • Statistical Transparency Report Regarding Use of National Security Authorities: Calendar Year 2017 (2018). [ODNI] [FAS] [ Local ]
      • Statistical Transparency Report Regarding Use of National Security Authorities for Calendar Year 2016 (2017). [ODNI] [FAS] [ Local ]
      • Statistical Transparency Report Regarding Use of National Security Authorities: Annual Statistics for Calendar Year 2015 Regarding Use of Certain National Security Legal Authorities (2016). [ODNI] [FAS] [ Local ]
      • Statistical Transparency Report Regarding Use of National Security Authorities: Annual Statistics for Calendar Year 2014 (2015). [ODNI] [FAS] [ Local ]
      • Statistical Transparency Report Regarding Use of National Security Authorities: Annual Statistics for Calendar Year 2013 (2014). [ODNI] [FAS] [ Local ]
    2. Individual Reports
      • Protecting U.S. Person Identities in Disseminations under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Nov. 2017). [ODNI] [ Local ]
    3. Other required reports
      • Signals Intelligence Reform Progress Reports: PPD-28, issued in 2013, was followed by three reports on SIGINT and implementation of the order. The 2016 report incorporates the IC’s implementation of the USA FREEDOM Act.
  4. U.S. Attorney General
    1. Cyclical Reporting

      1. 50 U.S.C. § 1807 requires the Attorney general to provide annual reports to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and Congress on the total number of applications made for orders and extensions of FISC orders approving electronic surveillance.

        The following reports are publicly available :

        • 2022 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (May 1, 2023). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • 2021 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 29, 2022). [DOJ] [Perma]
        • 2020 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 30, 2021). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • 2019 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (July 17, 2020). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2018 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (May 3, 2019). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2017 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 30, 2018). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2016 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 28, 2017). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2015 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 28, 2016). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2014 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 20, 2015). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2013 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 30, 2014). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2012 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 30, 2013). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2011 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 30, 2012). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2010 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 29, 2011). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2009 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 30, 2010). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2008 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (May 14, 2009). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2007 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 30, 2008). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2006 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 27, 2007). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2005 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 28, 2006). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2004 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 1, 2005). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2003 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 30, 2004). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2002 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 29, 2003). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2001 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 29, 2002). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2000 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 27, 2001). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 1999 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 27, 2000). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 1998 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 29, 1999). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 1997 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 29, 1998). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 1996 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 18, 1997). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 1995 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 16, 1996). [FAS]
        • 1994 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (May 1, 1995). [FAS]
        • 1993 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (May 3, 1994). [FAS]
        • 1992 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Mar. 10, 1993). [FAS]
        • 1991 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (May 29, 1992). [FAS]
        • 1990 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (May 10, 1991). [FAS]
        • 1989 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 13, 1990). [FAS]
        • 1988 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 12, 1989). [FAS]
        • 1987 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Mar. 30, 1988). [FAS]
        • 1986 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Mar. 24, 1987). [FAS]
        • 1985 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Mar. 5, 1986). [FAS]
        • 1984 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Mar. 6, 1985). [FAS]
        • 1983 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Mar. 6, 1984). [FAS]
        • 1982 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 4, 1983). [FAS]
        • 1981 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 15, 1982). [FAS]
        • 1980 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (Apr. 22, 1981). [FAS]
        • 1979 Annual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Report to Congress (1980?). [FAS]

      2. 50 U.S.C. § 1808 requires that the Attorney General “fully inform” HPSCI, SSCI, and the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on a semiannual basis concerning “all electronic surveillance," including:

        1. the total number of applications made for orders and their extension where the nature/location of each facility or place at which the surveillance is directed is not known;
        2. each criminal case in which information acquired under Title I has been authorized for use at trial;
        3. the total number of emergency employments of electronic surveillance and the subsequent orders approving/denying them; and
        4. the total number of authorizations under 1805(f) and subsequent employment of electronic surveillance under 1805(e) or physical searches under section 301(e).

        Pursuant to the statute, Congress provided unclassified reports 1979-1983 based on the AG’s classified semimanual reporting to the enumerated committees.

        Available Congressional reports include the following :

      3. 50 U.S.C. § 1826 requires the Attorney General to “fully inform” HPSCI, SSCI, and the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on a semiannual basis concerning all physical searches, including:
        1. The number of applications made for orders approving physical searches and the number of orders granted, modified, or denied;
        2. The number of physical searches which involved searches of the residences, offices, or personal property of U.S. persons and the number of occasions, if any, where the AG provided notice pursuant to 1825(b); and
        3. The number of emergency physical searches authorized by the Attorney General and the number of subsequent orders approving them.

      4. 50 U.S.C. § 1846(b) requires the Attorney General to “fully inform” HPSCI, SSCI, and the House and Senate Intelligence Committees on a semiannual basis (and in an unclassified form to the extent possible in light of national security) concerning:

        1. the number of applications for pen registers and trap and trace (PRTT) devices and the number granted, modified, or denied;
        2. the number of PRTT devices authorized on an emergency basis under § 1843 and the number subsequently approving or denying their installation;
        3. each department or agency on behalf of which the Attorney General or a designated attorney made an application for use of PRTT and the associated number granted, modified, or denied;
        4. a good faith estimate of the total number of subjects targeted via PRTT, rounded to the nearest 500, including, the number of US Persons and, of them, the number whose information was reviewed or accessed by a Federal officer, employee, or agent.

        The following reports are publicly available :

        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, January 1, 2022 to June 30, 2022 (Feb. 8, 2023). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 (July 19, 2022). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021 (Dec. 31, 2021). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 (July 16, 2021). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020 (Dec. 14, 2020). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 (July 28, 2020). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019 (Dec. 27, 2019). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, July 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (July 1, 2019). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018 (Feb. 14, 2019). [DOJ] [ Local ]
        • Report of the Attorney General on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (July 3, 2018). [DOJ] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • The Attorney General’s Report on the Use of Pen Registers and/or Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (collection of semiannual reports covering January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2012). [ODNI] [EPIC] [ Local ]

      5. 50 U.S.C. § 1862(b) requires the Attorney General to “fully inform” HPSCI, SSCI, and the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on an annual basis (in April) concerning requests for the production of tangible things under §1861, including:

        1. a summary of all compliance reviews conducted by the Government for the production of tangible things;
        2. the number of applications for orders approving requests for tangible things and the total number granted, modified, or denied;
        3. the number of applications made for orders approving requests for the production of call detail records on an ongoing basis for data created before, on, or after the date of the application relating to an authorized investigation (other than a threat assessment) and the total number of such orders granted, modified, or denied;
        4. the number of applications made for orders approving requests for the production of call detail records that do not fall into the above category and the total number granted, modified, or denied; and
        5. the number of orders granted, modified, or denied for the production of library circulation records, library patron lists, book sales records, or book customer lists; firearms sales records; tax return records; educational records; or medical records containing information that would identify a person.

        The following reports are publicly available :

        • The Attorney General’s Annual Report on Access to Certain Business Records for Foreign Intelligence Purposes Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Apr. 2012). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • The Attorney General’s Annual Report on Access to Certain Business Records for Foreign Intelligence Purposes Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Apr. 2011). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • The Attorney General’s Annual Report on Access to Certain Business Records for Foreign Intelligence Purposes Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Apr. 2010). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • The Attorney General’s Annual Report on Access to Certain Business Records for Foreign Intelligence Purposes Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (2009). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • The Attorney General’s Annual Report on Access to Certain Business Records for Foreign Intelligence Purposes Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Apr. 30, 2008). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • The Attorney General’s Annual Report on Access to Certain Business Records for Foreign Intelligence Purposes Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Apr. 27, 2007). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • The Attorney General’s Annual Report on Access to Certain Business Records for Foreign Intelligence Purposes Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Apr. 28, 2006). [ODNI] [ Local ]

      6. 50 U.S.C. § 1862(c) requires that the Attorney General annually submit an unclassified report to Congress concerning:

        1. the total number of applications made for orders approving requests for the production of tangible thing and the number granted, modified, or denied;
        2. the total number of applications made for orders approving requests for the production of tangible things in which the specific selection term does not specifically identify an individual, account, or personal device and the number granted, modified, or denied; and
        3. whether FISC has directed additional, particularized minimization procedures for the above orders beyond those adopted pursuant to §1861(g).

        These reports are included above in the annual reports provided for 50 U.S.C. § 1807.

      7. 50 U.S. C. § 1871 requires the Attorney General to provide semiannual reports to HPSCI, SSCI, and the House and Senate Judiciary Committees the aggregate number of persons targeted for orders in regard to:

        1. Electronic surveillanc
        2. Physical search
        3. PRTT
        4. Business records/tangible goods
        5. §§703, 704

        The report must also include:

        1. the number of individuals covered by an order issued in regard to targets suspected of engaging in international terrorism;
        2. the number of times the AG has authorized that FISA information or information derived from FISA may be used in a criminal proceeding;
        3. a summary of significant legal interpretations involving matters before FISC, including DOJ legal interpretations in applications or pleadings; and
        4. copies of all decisions, orders, or opinions of FISC/FISCR including significant construction or interpretations of FISA.

        The following reports are publicly available :

        • Semiannual Report of the Attorney General Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended by Section 6002 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (collection of semiannual reports covering January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2013). [Brennan Center] [ Local ]

      8. 50 U.S.C. § 1881f requires semiannual reporting by the Attorney General to HPSCI, SSCI, and the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on the implementation of § 702, including incidents of non-compliance.

        The following reports are publicly available :

        • 26th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Aug. 2022) (reporting period: Dec. 1, 2020-May 31, 2021). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 25th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Apr. 2022) (reporting period: June 1, 2020-Nov. 30, 2020). [ODNI] [ Local ]

        • 24th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Dec. 2021) (reporting period: Dec. 1, 2019-May 31, 2020). [ODNI] [ Local ]

          [NB: Report states that FBI under Section 702 of FISA inappropriately searched data for unnamed member of congress and local political organizations to determine if they had ties to foreign intelligence; during HPSCI hearing on Mar. 9th GOP Rep Darin LaHood (who leads working group on Section 702 renewal and oversight for HPSCI) said believed his name was improperly queries by FBI. Stated “I want to make clear the FBI's inappropriate querying of a duly elected member of Congress is egregious and a violation not only that degrades the trust in FISA, but is viewed as a threat to the separation of powers," LaHood said during the hearing. "I have had the opportunity to review the classified summary of this violation, and it is my opinion that the member of Congress that was wrongfully queried multiple times solely by his name was in fact me." The ODNI report states that there was one instance in which the "FBI queried the names of a local political party" and another event that "an [intelligence analyst] conducted approximately [redacted] queries…using only the name of a U.S. congressman." The report stated that the queries were "noncompliant" with the law and "overly broad." Biggest issue: backdoor searches.]

        • 23rd Semiannual Assessment of Compliance with Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Sept. 2021) (reporting period: June 1, 2019-Nov. 30, 2019). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 22nd Semiannual Assessment of Compliance with Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Aug. 2021) (reporting period: December 1, 2018 – May 31, 2019). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 21st Semiannual Assessment of Compliance with Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Mar. 2021) (reporting period: June 1, 2018-Nov. 30, 2018). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 20th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Nov. 2020) (reporting period: Dec. 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 19th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Dec. 2019) (reporting period: June 1, 2017 to Nov. 30, 2017). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 18th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Oct. 2018) (reporting period: Dec. 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 17th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Dec. 2017) (reporting period: June 1, 2016 – Nov. 30, 2016) [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 16th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Aug. 2017) (reporting period: Dec. 1, 2015 – May 31, 2016). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 15th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Nov. 2016) (reporting period: June 1, 2015 to Nov. 30, 2015). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 14th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Feb. 2016) (reporting period: Dec. 1, 2014 to May 31, 2015). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 13th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Sept. 2015) (reporting period: June 1, 2014 to Nov. 30, 2014). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 12th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (June 2015) (reporting period: Dec. 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 11th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Oct. 2014) (reporting period: June 1, 2013 to Nov. 30, 2013). [ODNI – Using Internet Archive] [ Local ]
        • 10th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Mar. 2014) (reporting period: Dec. 1, 2012 to May 31, 2013). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 9th Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Aug. 2013) (reporting period: June 1, 2012 to Nov. 30, 2012). [ODNI] [ Local ]
        • 3rd Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (May 2010) (reporting period: June 1, 2009 to Nov. 30, 2009). [ODNI] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 2nd Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Dec. 2009) (reporting period: December 1, 2008 to May 31, 2009). [ODNI] [FAS] [ Local ]
        • 1st Semiannual Assessment of Compliance With Procedures and Guidelines Issued Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (Mar. 2009) (reporting period: Sept. 4, 2008 to Nov. 30, 2008). [ODNI] [FAS] [ Local ]

    2. Individual Reports

      FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017, Pub. L. No. 115-118, 132 Stat. 3 (2018), § 203 requires AG and DNI to submit a report to Congress within 270 days on current/future challenges to effectiveness of FISA/recommended challenges in light of new/emerging technologies.

  5. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General

    FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017, Pub. L. No. 115-118, 132 Stat. 3 (2018), § 112 requires DOJ OIG to prepare and submit a report to Congress on querying procedures adopted in statute. The report must include assessments of FBI’s treatment of individuals of unknown citizenship, record-keeping practices, procedures to ensure compliance and compliance reviews, and impediments to accurate reporting of queries.

    USA FREEDOM Act required DOJ OIG to issue a report by June 2, 2016, on the FBI’s use of 215 2012-2014, any illegal or improper use of the provision, and the adequacy of the minimization procedures. The OIG reviewed the SMPs, court orders, and files supporting the orders:

    • A Review of the FBI's Use of Section 215 Orders for Business Records in 2012 through 2014 (Sept. 2016). [FAS] [DOJ] [ Local ]

    The USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-177, §106A directed the DOJ IG to conduct “a comprehensive audit of the effectiveness and use, including improper or illegal use” of the FBI’s use of § 215 for two time periods: CY 2002-04 and CY 2005-06. The first report was due March 9, 2007; the second was due Dec. 31, 2007. The IG subsequently issued three reports, repeatedly raising concern that DOJ had not adopted minimization procedures, as required by the Reauthorization Act, until 2013:

    • A Review of the FBI’s Use of Section 215 Orders: Assessment of Progress in Implementing Recommendations and Examination of Use in 2007 through 2009 (May 2015). [FAS] [ Local ]
    • A Review of the FBI’s Use of Section 215 Orders for Business Records in 2006 (March 2008, released Feb. 2016). [FAS] [ Local ]
    • A Review of the FBI's Use of Section 215 Orders for Business Records (March 2007, released Dec. 2014). [FAS] [ Local ]
  6. National Security Agency/Central Security Service Office of the Inspector General
    • 5 U.S.C. App. 5(a) requires inspectors general to submit semiannual reports to Congress not later than April 30 and October 31 summarizing the activities of the Office, including, inter alia, a description of significant problems, abuses, deficiencies, and recommendations; a list of each report and a summary of the particularly significant ones. The 2014 Intelligence Authorization Act elevated the NSA Inspector General to a statutory position, with the first IG appointed and Senate-confirmed in January 2018.
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, October 1, 2022 – March 31, 2023 (June 15, 2023). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, April 1, 2022 – Sept. 30, 2022 (Feb. 7, 2023). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, Oct. 1, 2021-Mar. 31, 2022 (July 14, 2022). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, Apr. 1, 2021-Sept. 2021 (Jan. 31, 2022). [NSA OIG] [Perma]
      • Semi-annual Report to Congress, Oct. 1, 2020-Mar. 31, 2021 (July 2021). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, Apr. 1, 2020-Sept. 30, 2020 (Feb. 10, 2021). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, Oct. 1, 2019-Mar. 31, 2020 (Sept. 2, 2020). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, Apr. 1, 2019-Sept. 30, 2019 (Jan. 23, 2020). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, Oct. 1, 2018-Mar. 31, 2019 (July 8, 2019). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, Apr. 1, 2018-Sept. 30, 2018 (Jan. 15, 2019). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
      • Semi-Annual Report to Congress, Oct. 1, 2017-Mar. 31, 2018 (July 25, 2018). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]

  7. Section 803 – Privacy and Civil Liberties Officers, Semi-Annual Reports

    9/11 Commission Act of 2007, § 803, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2000ee-1(a): requires ODNI, CIA, and Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Justice, State, and the Treasury, to designate at least one senior official as a “privacy and civil liberties officer.” P/CL officer to serve as principal advisor to the agency on three matters: (a) assisting the agency to consider privacy and civil liberties concerns in the development/implementation of laws/policies related to counterterrorism; investigating and reviewing agency actions/procedures to ensure agency is adequately considering privacy/civil liberties in its actions; (c) ensuring agency has adequate procedures to respond to complaints from individuals that privacy/civ libs violated. Each P/CL officer to issue semiannual reports on discharge of functions. Section 803 reports to be submitted to head of P/CL officer’s agency, designated congressional committees (SSCI/HPSCI, both Judiciary Committees, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives), and PCLOB. To the greatest extent possible, must be unclassified/available to the public.

    Office of the Director of National Intelligence [ ODNI ]

    • Office of Civil Liberties, Privacy, and Transparency Semiannual Report, July 1, 2021-December 31, 2021 (July 2022). [ODNI] [ Local ]
    • Office of Civil Liberties, Privacy, and Transparency Activities, January 1, 2019-June 30, 2021 (October 2021). [ODNI] [ Local ]

    Department of Justice [ DOJ ]

    • Privacy and Civil Liberties Activities Semi-Annual Report, First Semi-Annual Report, FY 2021, Oct. 1, 2020-March 31, 2021. [DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Privacy and Civil Liberties Activities Semi-Annual Report, Second Semi-Annual Report, FY 2020, April 1, 2020- September 30, 2020.[DOJ] [ Local ]

    Department of Defense [ DOD ]

    • Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer Report, Semiannual Report for Fiscal Year 2022, April, 2022-September 30, 2022. [DOD] [ Local ]
    • Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer Report, Semiannual Report for Fiscal Year 2022, October 1, 2021-March 31, 2022. [DOD] [ Local ]

    Department of State [ DOS ]

    • Report of Privacy Activities, Section 803(f) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, Public Law 110-53, codified at 42 USC 2000ee-1, Reporting Period July 1, 2022-December 31, 2022.[DOS] [ Local ]
    • Report of Privacy Activities, Section 803 of 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, Reporting Period January 1, 2022-June 30, 2022. [DOS] [ Local ]

    Department of Homeland Security [ DHS ]

    • Privacy Office Fiscal Year 2021 Second Semi-Annual Report to Congress, April 1, 2021-September 30, 2021 (July 2023).[DHS] [ Local ]
    • Privacy Office Fiscal Year 2021 First Semi-Annual Report to Congress, October 1, 2020-March 31, 2021 (December 2021). [DHS] [ Local ]

    Department of the Treasury [ DOT ]

    • 2022 Consolidated Privacy and Civil Liberties Reports. [DOT] [ Local ]
    • 2021 Consolidated Privacy and Civil Liberties Reports. [DOT] [ Local ]

    Department of Health and Human Services [ HHS ]

    • Section 803 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 Privacy Report, Semi-Annual Report for Calendar Year 2019, January 1, 2019-June 30, 2019. [HHS] [ Local ]

B. SPECIAL REPORTS

  1. National Security Agency
    • NSA/CSS Policy No. 1-34, Implementation of the Privacy Act of 1974 (June 9, 2003). [NSA] [ Local ]
    • NSA OIG, Inspector General Report of Investigation: Misuse of SIGINT Systems (Feb. 12, 2016). [Online Source] [ Local ]
    • NSA OIG, Special Study of the NSA Controls to Comply with Signals Intelligence Retention Requirements (Dec. 12, 2019). [NSA OIG] [ Local ]
    • Special Study of the National Security Agency/Central Security Service Implementation of a USG Organization’s Counterterrorism Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Authority (2017-2018) [finding noncompliance issues in regard to SMPs and making recommendations to NSA].
    • Civil Liberties & Privacy Office, NSA, Review of U.S. Person Privacy Protections in the Production and Dissemination of Serialized Intelligence Reports Derived from Signals Intelligence Acquired Pursuant to Title I and Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Oct. 11, 2017). [NSA] [ Local ]
    • Intelligence Acquired Pursuant to Title I and Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Oct. 11, 2017). [NSA] [ Local ]
    • Civil Liberties & Privacy Office, NSA, Transparency Report: THE US FREEDOM Act Business Records FISA Implementation (Jan. 15, 2016). [NSA] [ Local ]
    • Report on the Special Study of NSA Controls to Comply with the FISA Amendments Act §§704 and 705(b) Targeting and Minimization Procedures, ST-15-0002 (Jan. 7, 2016). [NSA] [ Local ]
    • Implementation of § 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act and § 702 of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, ST-14-0002 (Feb. 20, 2015, released Feb. 17, 2016) (compiled by NSA OIG at the request of the Senate Judiciary Committee; provides detailed, comprehensive view of operation of §§ 215 and 702, including compliance concerns.) [NSA] [ Local ]
    • Civil Liberties & Privacy Office, NSA, NSA’s Civil Liberties and Privacy Protection for Targeted SIGINT Activities Under Executive Order 12333 (Oct. 7, 2014). [NSA] [ Local ]
    • Civil Liberties & Privacy Office, NSA, NSA’s Implementation of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Section 702 (Apr. 16, 2014). [NSA] [ Local ]
    • Report on the Special Study: Assessment of Management Controls Over FAA § 702, ST-11-0009 (Mar. 29, 2013) (reviews NSA training, access, review, and oversight of § 702 collection.) [NSA] [ Local ]
    • Final Report of the Audit on the FISA Amendments Act § 702 Detasking Requirements, AU-10-0023 (Nov. 24, 2010) (reviews process via which NSA transitioned from 702 to other FISA authorities; identifies lack of standardized process.) [NSA] [ Local ]
    • Report on the Assessment of Management Controls to Implement the Protect America Act (PAA) of 2007, ST-08-0001 (Apr. 7, 2008). [ACLU] [ Local ]
    • Office of the Inspector Gen., NSA/CSS, Report on the Special Study of NSA’s Purge of Pen Register and Trap and Trace Bulk Metadata (redacted date, released Nov. 10, 2015). [ACLU] [ Local ]
    • Office of the Inspector Gen., Nat’l Sec. Agency, ST-06-0018, Assessment of Management Controls for Implementing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Order: Telephony Business Records (undated) (see page 94 of 1846 and 1862 Production). [ODNI] [ Local ]
    • NSA Director of Civil Liberties and Privacy Office Report, NSA’s Implementation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Section 702 (2014). [NSA] [Perma]

  2. U.S. House of Representatives

    USA PATRIOT and Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2005.

  3. U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
    • HPSCI, Report on Russian Active Measures (Mar. 22, 2018). [HSPCI] [ Local ]
  4. U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
    • Audits and Projects Rep. 22-01, Organizational Assessment: The National Counterintelligence and Security Center (Sept. 2022). [SSCI] [ Local ]
    • Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election, Volume 1: Russian Efforts Against Election Infrastructure with Additional Views, S. Rep. No. 116-xx (2019). [SSCI] [ Local ]
    • Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election, Volume 2: Russia’s Use of Social Media with Additional Views, S. Rep. No. 116-xx (2019). [SSCI] [ Local ]
    • Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election, Volume 3: U.S. Government Response to Russian Activities, S. Rep. No. 116-xx (2020). [SSCI] [ Local ]
    • Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election, Volume 4: Review of the Intelligence Community Assessment, S Rep. No. 116-xx (2020). [SSCI] [ Local ]
      • Volume 4 Excerpts (Additional Declassifications) (released July 29, 2020). [SSCI] [ Local ]
    • Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election, Volume 5: Counterintelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities, S Rep. No. 116-xx (2020). [SSCI] [ Local ]
  5. U.S. Department of Justice

    • John H. Durham, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Office of Special Counsel, Report on Matters Related to Intelligence Activities and Investigations Arising Out of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns (May 12, 2023). [DOJ] [ Local ]

      Note: Mueller investigation into Russian government’s efforts to interfere in 2016 presidential election “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.” May 13, 2019, AG Barr directed John Durham, U.S. Attorney, to undertake preliminary review of matters linked to the election. Progressed to a criminal investigation. Feb. 6, 2020, AG appointed Durham as Special Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 515, having determined that “in light of the extraordinary circumstances relating to these matters, the public interest warrants Mr. Durham continuing this investigation pursuant to the powers and independence afforded by the Special Counsel regulations.” Directed him "to the maximum extent possible and consistent with the law and the policies and practices of the Department of Justice, shall submit to the Attorney General a final report, and such interim reports as he deems appropriate, in a form that will permit public dissemination.". Final report submitted pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 600.8(c): "[a]t the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he ... shall provide the Attorney General a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

    • U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Recent Effort to Strengthen FISA Compliance (Feb. 28, 2023). [DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Memorandum from William P. Barr, Att’y Gen., DOJ, to the Deputy Att’y Gen. et al., Augmenting the Internal Compliance Functions of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (Aug. 31, 2020). [DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Memorandum from William P. Barr, Att’y Gen., DOJ, to the Deputy Att’y Gen. et al., Supplemental Reforms to Enhance Compliance, Oversight, and Accountability with Respect to Certain Foreign Intelligence Activities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (Aug. 31, 2020). [DOJ] [ Local ]

    • U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Report on the National Security Agency’s Bulk Collection Programs for USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization (2011). [FAS] [ Local ]

      Note: This report was the subject of FOIA litigation 2011-2013 and was subsequently redacted/released as part of the declassification review following the June 2013 Guardian Article. A similar document was provided to Congress in 2009.

    • U.S. Dep’t of Justice, White Paper: Legal Authorities Supporting the Activities of the National Security Agency Described by the President, (Jan. 19, 2006). [DOJ] [ Local ]
  6. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General
    1. FISA
      • Audit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Execution of Its Woods Procedures for the Applications Filed with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Relating to U.S. Persons (Sept. 30, 2021). [OIG] [ Local ]
      • Management Advisory Memorandum from Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector Gen., to Christopher Wray, Director, FBI, regarding the Audit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Execution of its Woods Procedures for Application Filed with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Relating to U.S. Persons (Mar. 30, 2020). [FAS] [ Local ]
      • Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation (“Horowitz Report”) (rev. Dec. 20, 2019). [FAS] [ Local ]
        • Additional declassification of three footnotes of the report (released Apr. 2, 2020). [Senate] [ Local ]
        • Additional declassification of thirty-six footnotes of the report (released Apr. 15, 2020). [Senate] [ Local ]
      • A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Activities Under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments Act of 2008 (Sept. 2012, as released in redacted form in Jan. 2016). [FAS] [ Local ]
      • A Review of the FBI's Use of Pen Register and Trap and Trace Devices Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in 2007 through 2009: Executive Summary (June 2015). [FAS] [ Local ]
      • A Review of the FBI's Use of Section 215 Orders: Assessment of Progress in Implementing Recommendations and Examination of Use in 2007 through 2009 (May 2015). [FAS] [ Local ]
      • A Review of the FBI's Use of Section 215 Orders for Business Records in 2006 (Mar. 2008, as released in redacted form in Feb. 2016). [FAS] [ Local ]
      • A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Use of Section 215 Orders for Business Records (Mar. 2007, as released in redacted form in Dec. 2014). [FAS] [ Local ]
      • A Review of the FBI’s Handling of Intelligence Information Related to the September 11 Attacks (Nov. 2004, as released in redacted form in June 2005). [OIG] [ Local ]
    2. NSLs
      • Office of the Inspector Gen., DOJ, A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Use of National Security Letters: Assessment of Progress in Implementing Recommendations and Examination of Use in 2007 through 2009 (Aug. 2014). [OIG] [ Local ]
      • Office of the Inspector Gen., DOJ, A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Use of Exigent Letters and Other Informal Requests for Telephone Records (Jan. 2010) (focused on exigent letters, off-grid; serious issues). [OIG] [ Local ]
      • Office of the Inspector Gen., DOJ, A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Use of National Security Letters: Assessment of Corrective Actions and Examination of NSL usage in 2006 (Mar. 2008) (2nd report — only 2006, still significant issues). [OIG] [ Local ]
      • Office of the Inspector Gen., DOJ, A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Use of National Security Letters (Mar. 2007) (1st report — illegal NSLs, exigent letters, off-grid). [OIG] [ Local ]
      • Office of the Inspector Gen., DOJ, A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Use of National Security Letters (Mar. 2007) (Feb. 2016 re-release of 1st OIG report with some previously redacted information now unredacted). [OIG] [ Local ]
  7. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
    • Senior Advisory Grp. Panel on Commercially Available Info., Report to the Director of National Intelligence (Jan. 27, 2022). [Perma] [ Local ]
    • ODNI, Assessment of Oversight and Compliance with Targeting Procedures (2016). [Perma] [ Local ]
  8. Federal Bureau of Investigation 

    • Memorandum for Office of Civil Liberties, Privacy, and Transparency, Office fo the Director of National Intelligence, from FBI PCLO, Re: FBI Review of Title I and Section 702 of FISA Dissemination Protections for U.S. Person Information (Nov. 2017) [DNI] [ Local ]

      ODNI requested that NSA, CIA, FBI PCLOs review procedures re: privacy protections for USPs re: dissemination of FI collected under Title I and Section 702 of FISA. Note that re: FBI, compliance/oversight carried out by: FBI Inspection Division, FBI Office of Integrity and Compliance (OIC), FBI OGC’s National Security and Cyber Law Branch (NSCLB), FBI PCLO, PCLU, DOJ Office of Intelligence (OI), and DOJ Office of the Inspector General. External compliance and oversight activities are conducted by ODNI, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), Congress, and the FISC.

    • United States Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Integrity and Compliance Program, I-2012-001 (November 2011). [HSDL] [Perma]

      In June 2007 the FBI established the Integrity and Compliance Program (ICP) to identify and mitigate legal compliance risks. It was designed to proactively ID/correct weaknesses in policy, training, monitoring, and auditing that could result in FBI employees violating the law. The ICP is modeled on corporate compliance programs that institute systematic procedures to ensure that companies adhere to the laws that govern them. The ICP's goal is to prevent FBI employees from violating the laws and policies that govern their work by: (1) managing the Ethics and Standards of Conduct program (ethics program) and (2) identifying and reducing legal compliance risks in operations FBI-wide and at the program level. The FBI's Office of Integrity and Compliance (OIC) manages the ICP. The OIC's mission is to 'develop, implement and oversee a program that ensures that there are processes and procedures in place that facilitate FBI compliance with both the letter and spirit of all applicable laws, regulations, and policies.' This report is on the effectiveness of the ICP.

  9. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) 

    PCLOB is an independent agency that is responsible for analyzing and reviewing executive branch actions to protect against terrorism, with a particular eye towards the protection of privacy and civil liberties. 42 U.S.C. § 2000ee(a), (c). It has a full-time chair and four members, each of whom serve for six years. 42 U.S.C. § 2000ee(h)(1), (h)(4).

    • Report on the Surveillance Program Operated Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Sept. 28, 2023). [PCLOB] [ Local ]
    • Recommendations Assessment Report (Aug. 31, 2022) (assessing implementations of recommendations in Section 215 Report, Section 702 Report, PPD-28, Deep Dive 1, and use of XKEYSCORE by NSA as analytic tool for counterterrorism purposes). [PCLOB] [ Local ]
    • Deep Dives I, II
      • Central Intelligence Agency, Release Statement on Declassification of Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) Executive Order 12333 Review (i.e., Deep Dives I, II) (Feb. 10, 2022). [Perma] [ Local ]
      • Report on CIA Financial Data Activities in Support of ISIL-Related Counterterrorism Efforts (“Deep Dive I”) (Jan. 3, 2017) (Released Feb. 10, 2022; see CIA statement issued same day to confirm original date). [PCLOB] [Perma] [ Local ]
      • PCLOB Staff Recommendations on CIA Counterterrorism Activities Conducted Pursuant to EO 12333 (Feb. 10, 2022) (“Deep Dive II”). [PCLOB] [Perma] [ Local ]
      • Member Travis LeBlanc’s Statement on the Board’s Report and Recommendations on CIA Counterterrorism Activities Conducted Pursuant to E.O. 12333 (re: Deep Dives I, II) (Feb. 11, 2022). [PCLOB] [Perma] [ Local ]
    • Chairman’s White Paper: Oversight of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (June 2021). [PCLOB] [ Local ]
    • Report on Executive Order 12333 (Apr. 2, 2021). [PCLOB] [ Local ]
    • Statement by Chairman Adam Klein on Treasury’s Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (Nov. 19, 2020). [PCLOB] [ Local ]
    • Report on the Government’s Use of the Call Detail Records Program Under the USA Freedom Act (Feb. 2020). [PCLOB] [ Local ]

    • Report to the President on the Implementation of Presidential Policy Directive 28: Signals Intelligence Activities (FOIA reply dated Oct. 16, 2018). [PCLOB] [ Local ]

      Note: NSA, CIA, and FBI consider PPD-28 to apply to FISA § 702 communications.

    • Recommendations for Privacy and Civil Liberties Officers: Reports under Section 803 of the 9/11 Commission Act (June 10, 2016). [PCLOB] [ Local ]
    • Recommendations Assessment Report (Feb. 5, 2016) (Update on Government’s Implementation of the PCLOB Recommendations on Section 215 and Section 702). [PCLOB] [ Local ]
    • Recommendations Assessment Report (Jan. 29, 2015) (Update on the Government’s Implementation of the Board’s Recommendations on Section 215 and Section 702). [PCLOB] [ Local ]
    • Report on the Surveillance Program Operated Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (July 2, 2014). [Perma] [ Local ]
    • Report on the Telephone Records Program Conducted Under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act and on the Operations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Jan. 23, 2014). [Perma] [ Local ]
  10. Central Intelligence Agency
    • Office of Privacy & Civil Liberties, CIA, Review of Procedures and Practices of CIA to Disseminate United States Person Information Acquired Pursuant to Titles I and III and Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) (Aug. 2017). [CIA] [ Local ]
  11. President’s Review Group
    • President's Review Grp. on Intelligence and Commc’ns Techs., Liberty and Security in a Changing World: Report and Recommendations of The President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies (Dec. 12, 2013). [Obama White House Archives] [ Local ]
  12. Open Technology Institute
    • Open Tech. Inst., Section 702 Compliance Violation Chart (2017). [OTI]
  13. Intelligence Community Assessment
    • Nat'l Intel. Council, Intel. Cmty. Assessment 2020-00078D, Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Elections (2020) [ODNI] [ Local ]
    • Nat'l Intel. Council, Intel. Cmty. Assessment 2017-01D, Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections (2017) [SSCI] [ Local ]
    • Intel. Cmty. Assessement, Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections, Annex A (Dec. 30, 2016) [Senate] [ Local ]
  14. White House
    • President’s Intelligence Advisory Board (PIAB) and Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB) Review of FISA Section 702 and Recommendations for Reauthorization (July 2023). [White House] [ Local ]
    • National Security Strategy (October 2022) [White House] [ Local ]
    • The National Counterintelligence Strategy of the United States of America (2007)[ODNI] [ Local ]
  15. Department of Homeland Security
    • Report on Border Searches
      • Office of Inspector General, CBP Continues to Experience Challenges Managing Searches of Electronic Devices at Ports of Entry [REDACTED], Sept. 23, 2021.[DHS.OIG] [ Local ]
    • Privacy Impact Assessments
      • Privacy Impact Assessment Update for DBP Border Searches of Electronic Devices, DHS/CBP/PIA-008(a), Jan. 4, 2018.[DHS] [ Local ]
      • Privacy Impact Assessment for the Border Searches of Electronic Devices, Aug. 25, 2009. [DHS] [ Local ]
    • Customs and Border Protection Directives
      • Border Search of Electronic Devices, CBP Directive No. 3340-049A, Jan. 4, 2018. [DHS] [ Local ]
      • Border Search of Electronic Devices Containing Information, CBP Directive No. 3340-049, Aug. 20, 2009. [Online Source] [ Local ]
  16. Offices of Inspectors General of the Department of Defense, Department of Justice, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Office of the Director of National Intelligence 

    • Offices of Inspectors General of the Department Defense, Department of Justice, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, and Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Report on the President’s Surveillance Program, Volume I, 2009-0013-A (July 10, 2009). [[ODNI] [ Local ]

      This report was required by the 2008 FAA, Section 301 (DOD, DOJ, ODNI, CIA, NSA, and any other IC element that participated in PSP to undertake comprehensive review of PSP. All facts, product and use of product, legal reviews/information about the program, communication and participation of individuals/entities related to the program; interaction with the FISC, any other relevant matters; required to file a comprehensive report. The IGs issued an interim report on Sept. 10, 2008.

    • Offices of Inspectors General of the Department Defense, Department of Justice, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, and Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Annex to the Report on the President’s Surveillance Program, Volume II, 2009-0013-A (July 10, 2009). [ODNI, Part 1] [ODNI, Part 2] [ODNI, Part 3] [ Local ]
    • Offices of Inspectors General of the Department Defense, Department of Justice, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, and Office of the Director of National Intelligence, (U) Annex to the Report on the President’s Surveillance Program, Volume III, 2009-0013-A (July 10, 2009). [ODNI, Part 1] [ODNI, Part 2] [ODNI, Part 3] [ODNI, Part 4] [ODNI, Part 5] [ODNI, Part 6] [ Local ]
  17. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel
    • Memorandum for the Attorney General on Review of the Legality of the STELLAR WIND Program from Jack L. Goldsmith III, Assistant Attorney General (May 6, 2004).[DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Memorandum for Glenn A. Fine, Inspector General, on Constitutionality of Certain FBI Intelligence Bulletins from Jack L. Goldsmith III, Assistant Attorney General (Apr. 5, 2004). [DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Letter to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly from John Yoo, Deputy Assistant Attorney General (May 17, 2002) (discussing legal justifications for Stellar Wind). [DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Memorandum for the Attorney General from John C. Yoo, Deputy Assistant Attorney General (Nov. 2, 2001). [DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Memorandum for the Attorney General on Constitutionality of Expanded Electronic Surveillance Techniques against Terrorists from John Yoo, Deputy Assistant Attorney General (Nov. 2, 2001). [DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Memorandum for David S. Kris, Associate Deputy Attorney General, on Constitutionality of Amending Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to Change the “Purpose” Standard for Searches, from John C. Yoo, Deputy Assistant Attorney General (Sept. 25, 2001). [DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Memorandum for Steven Garfinkel, Director, Information Security Oversight Office, on ISCAP Jurisdiction Over Classification Decisions by the Director of Central Intelligence Regarding Intelligence Sources and Methods, from Randolph D. Moss, Acting Assistant Attorney General (Oct. 5, 1999). [DOJ] [ Local ]
    • Memorandum for Michael Vatis, Deputy Director, Executive Office for National Security, on Standards for Searches Under Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, from Walter Dellinger, Assistant Attorney General (Feb. 14, 1995). [DOJ] [ Local ]

C. FISC CORRESPONDENCE TO CONGRESS

  • Letter from James E. Boasberg, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to Jim Jordan, Ranking Member, House Comm. on Oversight & Reform (Jan. 29, 2020). [FISC] [ Local ]
  • Letter from Rosemary M. Collyer, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to Bob Goodlatte, Chairman, House Comm. on the Judiciary (Feb. 15, 2018). [FISC] [ Local ]
  • Letter from Rosemary M. Collyer, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to Devin Nunes, Chairman, House Permanent Select Comm. on Intelligence (Feb. 15, 2018). [FISC] [ Local ]
  • Letter from Rosemary M. Collyer, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to Ron Wyden, U.S. Senator (Aug. 23, 2017). [FISC] [ Local ]
  • Letter from Reggie B. Walton, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to Charles E. Grassley, Ranking Member, Senate Comm. on the Judiciary (Oct. 11, 2013). [FISC] [ Local ]
  • Letter from Reggie B. Walton, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman, Senate Comm. on the Judiciary (Oct. 11, 2013). [FISC] [ Local ]
  • Letter from Reggie B. Walton, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to Charles E. Grassley, Ranking Member, Senate Comm. on the Judiciary (July 29, 2013). [FISC] [ Local ]
  • Letter from Reggie B. Walton, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman, Senate Comm. on the Judiciary (July 29, 2013). [FISC] [ Local ]
  • Letter from Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman, Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, and Arlen Specter and Charles E. Grassley, Members, Senate Comm. on the Judiciary (Aug. 20, 2002), reprinted in The USA PATRIOT Act in Practice: Shedding Light on the FISA Process: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 107th Cong. 142 (2002). [ Local ]

D. CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE REPORTS

  1. United States House Permanent Selection Committee on Intelligence, 1976 (Pike Committee)
    • The Unexpurgated Pike Report, Report of the House Select Committee on Intelligence (1976). [Internet Archive] [Perma]
  2. Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activites 1975-76 (Church Committee)
    • Rules of Procedure and S. Res. 21, 94th Congress (1975) [Perma]
    • Interim Report, Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders, S. Rep. No. 4-465 (November 20, 1975) Perma]
    • Staff Report, Covert Action in Chile, 1963-1973 (1975) [Perma]
    • Final Report, S. Rep. No. 94-755 (1976)
      • Book I, Foreign and Military Intelligence [Perma]
      • Book II, Intelligence Activites and the Rights of Americans [Perma]
      • Book III, Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activites and the Rights of Americans [Perma]
      • Book IV, Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Foreign and Military Intelligence [Perma]
      • Book V, The Investigation of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: Performance of the Intelligence Agencies [Perma]
      • Book VI, Supplementary Reports on Intelligence Activites [Perma]
    • Hearings
      • Volume 1, Unauthorized Storage of Toxic Agents (September 16, 17, and 18, 1975) [Perma]
      • Volume 2, Huston Plan (September 23, 24, and 25, 1975) [Perma]
      • Volume 3, Internal Revenue Service (October 2, 1975) [Perma]
      • Volume 4, Mail Opening (October 21, 22, and 24, 1975) [Perma]
      • Volume 5, The National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights (October 29 and November 6, 1975) [Perma]
      • Volume 6, Federal Bureau of Investigation (November 18, 19, December 2, 3, 9, 10, and 11, 1975) [Perma]
      • Volume 7, Covert Action (December 4 and 5, 1975) [Perma]
    • Subcommittee to Investigate Individuals Representing the Interest of Foreign Governments, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Inquiry Into the Matter of Billy Carter and Libya, S. Rep. No. 96-1015 (1980) [Perma]
    • Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran-Contra Affair, 1987 [SSCI]
    • Report of the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs, 1993 [Perma]
    • Staff Study, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, IC21: The Intelligence Community in the 21st Century, 1996 [GPO] [Perma]
    • House Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China, H. Rep. No. 105-851 (1999) [Perma]
  3. Special Intelligence Community Reports
    • Comprehensive Revised Report with Addendums on Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction, Vol. 1 2004 (Duelfer Report) [Perma]
    • Comprehensive Revised Report with Addendums on Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction, Vol. 2 2004 (Duelfer Report) [Perma]
    • Comprehensive Revised Report with Addendums on Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction, Vol. 3 2004 (Duelfer Report) [Perma]
    • Addendums to Comprehensive Revised Report with Addendums on Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2005 (Duelfer Report) [Perma]

E. COMMISSION REPORTS

  1. Commission on CIA Activities Within the United States, 1975 (Rockefeller Commission)
    • Report to the President (1975) [AARC] [Perma]
  2. Commission on the Roles and Capabilities of the United States Intelligence Community, 1996 (Aspin - Brown Commission)
    • Preparing for the 21st Century: An Appraisal of U.S. Intelligence [GPO] [Perma]
  3. National Commission on Terrorism, 2000 (Bremer Commission)
    • Countering the Changing Threat of International Terrorism[GPO]
  4. U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century (Hart-Rudman Commission)
    • New World Coming: American Security in the 21st Century, The Phase I Report on the Emerging Global Security Environment for the First Quarter of the 21st Century (September 15, 1999)[GPO] [Perma]
    • New World Coming: American Security in the 21st Century, Supporting Research and Analysis (September 15, 1999)[Perma]
    • New World Coming: American Security in the 21st Century, Study Addendum (September 15, 1999) [Perma]
    • Seeking a National Strategy: A Concert for Preserving Security and Promoting Freedom, The Phase II Report on a U.S. National Security Strategy for the 21st Century (April 15, 2000) [Perma]
    • Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century (February 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, Study Addendum Vol. I - Key Observations and Overarching Process April 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, Study Addendum Vol. II - Executive Office of the President (April 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, Study Addendum Vol. III - Congress (April 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, Study Addendum Vol. IV - Department of Defense (April 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, Study Addendum Vol. V - Department of State (April 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, Study Addendum Vol. VI - Intelligence Community (April 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, Study Addendum Vol. VII - Executive Branch Activites (April 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Creating Defense Excellence: Defense Addendum to Road Map for National Security (May 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Journeys Through the Teacher Pipeline: Recapializing American Education, Partial Cost Estimates for Road Map for National Security (May 15, 2001) [Perma]
    • Road Map for National Security: Addendum on Implementation April 15, 2001) [Perma]
  5. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Against the United States, 2001 (9/11 Commission)
    • The 9/11 Commission Report (July 22, 2004) [GPO]
    • Monograph on Terrorist Fianancing, Staff Report to the Commission (August 21, 2004) [GPO]
    • 9/11 and Terrorist Travel, Staff Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (August 21, 2004) [GPO]
  6. Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2005 (Robb - Silberman Commission)
    • The Commission on the Intelligence Cababilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, Report to the President of the United States (March 31, 2005) [GPO]

F. INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS

  • OECD, Declaration on Government Access to Personal Data Held by Private Sector Entities, OECD/LEGAL/0487 (2023). [OECD] [ Local ]

G. MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS

  1. Letter from Kevin Tieman to Charlie Savage regarding FOIA request, (Sept. 17, 2017). [NYT] [Perma]
  2. National Security Directive (NSD) 42, National Policy for the Security of National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems (1990). [FAS] [Perma]
  3. National Security Council Intelligence Directive (NSCID) No.6 (1972). [FAS] [Perma]
  4. Verified Application, In re Carter W. Page, A U.S. Person, No. 16-1182 (FISA Ct. Oct. 21, 2016). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  5. Verified Application, In re Carter W. Page, A U.S. Person, No. 17-52 (FISA Ct. Jan. 12, 2017). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  6. Verified Application, In re Carter W. Page, A U.S. Person, No. 17-375 (FISA Ct. Apr. 7, 2017). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  7. Verified Application, In re Carter W. Page, A U.S. Person, No. 17-679 (FISA Ct. June 29, 2017). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  8. FBI, Verbatim Transcript, Crossfire Typhoon and FBI Confidential Human Source (undated, declassified Mar. 13, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  9. Letter from John C. Demers, Assistant Attorney Gen., to Rosemary M. Collyer, Presiding Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, In re Carter W. Page, A U.S. Person, Nos. 16-1182, 17-52, 17-375, 17-679 (FISA Ct. July 12, 2018). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  10. FBI, Verbatim Transcript, Crossfire Typhoon and FBI Confidential Human Source (undated, declassified Apr. 3, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  11. FBI, Verbatim Transcript, Crossfire Typhoon and FBI Confidential Human Source (undated, declassified Apr. 24, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  12. FBI, Verbatim Transcript, Crossfire Typhoon and FBI Confidential Human Source (undated, declassified May 5, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  13. Memorandum from Rod J. Rosenstein, Acting Att'y Gen., DOJ, to Robert S. Mueller, III, Special Couns., DOJ (Aug. 2, 2017). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  14. FBI Electronic Communication, Interview of [Christopher Steele's] Primary Subsource, Crossfire Hurricane (Feb. 9, 2017). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  15. Michael S. Schmidt et al., Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contacts with Russian Intelligence, N.Y. Times (Feb. 14, 2017), with type-written comments [by Peter Strzok] (undated, declassified on July 17, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  16. Intelligence Briefings Provided During the 2016 Presidential Election (including a Document Brief to the Republican Candidate for U.S. President (Aug. 30, 2016), an Outline Used During a Trump Brief (Aug. 17, 2016), and Emails Related to the Transition Team CI Briefs (Aug. 23 & 24, 2016). [S. Comms. on Fin. and Homeland Sec. & Governmental Affairs] [ Local ]
  17. FBI, SSCI Briefing on Former Employee of Christopher Steele, Draft Talking Points as of 14 February 2018 (declassified August 7, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  18. FBI Electronic Communication, Defensive Brief to Counsel for Hillary Clinton (Oct. 22, 2015), and emails related to the Clinton Defensive Briefs (Mar. 2, 6 & 9, 2015, Apr. 14 & 15, 2015). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  19. FBI, Overview of the Counterintelligence Investigation of Christopher Steele's Primary Sub-Source (Sept. 23, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  20. Letter from John Ratcliffe, Dir. of Nat'l Intel., to Lindsey Graham, Chairman, S. Comm. on the Judiciary (Sept. 29, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  21. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Handling Agent 1 (Mar. 3, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  22. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Michael B. Steinbach (June 12, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  23. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Stephen C. Laycock (June 15, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  24. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Dana J. Boente (June 22, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  25. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Bruce Ohr (June 30, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  26. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Stuart Evans (July 31, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  27. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Supervisory Special Agent 1 (Aug. 27, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  28. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Jonathan Moffa (Sept. 9, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  29. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Deputy Chief, Counterintelligence & Exp. Control Section, Just. Dep’t (Sept. 18, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  30. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Case Agent 1 (Sept. 25, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]
  31. S. Comm. on the Judiciary, Interview of Supervisory Intel. Analyst (Oct. 29, 2020). [S. Comm. on the Judiciary] [ Local ]

Author

No result

Publisher

No result

Court

No result

Docket Number

No result

Document Type

No result

Date Created

Date Issued