Search Full Text

… Denying defendant’s motion for disclosure of FISA materials. 521 F. Supp. 2d at 130. Minimization procedures required by FISA do not apply to defendants who are not “unconsenting United States persons” and thus do not …

… Finding that the plaintiff’s “allegations do not establish Defendants willfully violated the use and disclosure provisions for information gathered from surveillance conducted pursuant to FISA.” 142 F. Supp. 3d at 1170. …

… Denying defendant’s “motions seeking discovery of [FISA] materials.” 1990 WL 78522, at *1. … United States v. Johnson, No. 89–221–MA, 1990 WL 78522 (D. Mass. Apr. 13, 1990). … UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF …

… Denying defendant’s Motion for Disclosure of FISA Applications and Orders and denying defendant’s Motion to Suppress FISA-derived Evidence. 2010 WL 1641167, at *7. … United States v. Nicholson, No. 09-CR-40-BR, 2010 WL …

… Denying “defendant's Motions to Suppress Illegally Obtained FISA Evidence.” 2011 WL 3652524, at *2. … United States v. Mehanna, No. 09–10017–GAO, 2011 WL 3652524 (D. Mass. Aug. 19, 2011). … Case 1:09-cr-10017-GAO Document …

… Denying defendant’s “Motion to Disclose FISA–Related Material Necessary to Litigate Motions for Discovery and for Suppression of the Fruits of FISA Activity.” 2012 WL 12952303, at *7. … United States v. Mohamud, No. …

… Denying defendants’ “defendants' Motion for Discovery of Classified Materials [97], Motion to Declare Unconstitutional the Classified Information Procedures Act & Motion to Compel Disclosure of Classified Discovery [109], …

… Denying defendant’s Motion for Full Discovery Regarding the Facts and Circumstances Underlying Surveillance and Motion to Compel Immediate Production to the Court of Classified Documents Related to Pending Posttrial …

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Vacation of Conviction and Alternative Remedies of Dismissal of the Indictment, Suppression of Evidence, and New Trial for the Government's Violation of the Pretrial Notice Statute [500], …

… Rejecting “contentions raised by [defendant and denying] each of his motions . . . challenging such investigatory procedures. This action thus confirms the denial of the motions to suppress . . . already provisionally …