Search Full Text

… “Because the FISA surveillance was not illegal, this Court need not consider the parties' arguments as to whether the illegality of FISA surveillance may serve as a defense to contempt in a grand jury proceeding.” 347 F.3d …

… Rejecting defendant’s argument that “evidence gathered under FISA cannot be used in domestic criminal investigations or prosecutions.” 477 F.3d at 897. Because “FISA requires each intercept to be authorized by a warrant,” …

… Trial judge “failed to make[] the additional determination, based on full access to all classified materials and the defense's proffer of its version of events, of whether it's possible to determine the validity of the …

… Finding that “FISA applications [were] free of any procedural defects.” 761 F. 3d at 681. Finding that “FISA applications contain ample evidence to support a finding of probable cause.” Id. View document: …

… Affirming “order of the district court denying suppression of the FISA evidence and its evidentiary fruits.” 840 F. 3d at 343. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13937278411929636062&q=840… … …

… Denying defendant’s motion for disclosure of FISA materials. 521 F. Supp. 2d at 130. Minimization procedures required by FISA do not apply to defendants who are not “unconsenting United States persons” and thus do not …

… Denying defendant’s “motions seeking discovery of [FISA] materials.” 1990 WL 78522, at *1. … United States v. Johnson, No. 89–221–MA, 1990 WL 78522 (D. Mass. Apr. 13, 1990). … UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF …

… Denying “defendant's Motions to Suppress Illegally Obtained FISA Evidence.” 2011 WL 3652524, at *2. … United States v. Mehanna, No. 09–10017–GAO, 2011 WL 3652524 (D. Mass. Aug. 19, 2011). … Case 1:09-cr-10017-GAO Document …

… Rejecting “contentions raised by [defendant and denying] each of his motions . . . challenging such investigatory procedures. This action thus confirms the denial of the motions to suppress . . . already provisionally …

… The Court denied motion to suppress FISA-acquired evidence, “based on a determination, after an extensive in camera review of the classified materials submitted to the FISA Court, that there was probable cause to believe …