Search Full Text

… Rejecting “Appellants’ contention that the FISA surveillance was illegal” and denying “Appellants’ request for disclosure of the FISA materials.” 221 F.3d at 554. View document: https://perma.cc/A43E-LQJ8 … United States …

… Affirming “district court's denial of Damrah's motions to compel FISA materials and suppress FISA evidence.” 412 F.3d at 625. View document: https://perma.cc/GLS2-ULGL … United States v. Damrah, 412 F.3d 618 (6th Cir. …

… “FISA contains both a notice clause as well as an exclusionary procedure for illegally seized electronic surveillance” but “[t]he telling absence of grand juries from Section 1806(c) allows the government to introduce FISA …

… Affirming the district court’s decision to deny defendants’ “motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to warrants issued under [FISA].” 896 F.3d at 297. View document: …

… Finding that “the lower court property denied the motion for discovery” of FISA applications. 1990 WL 101946, at *3. … United States v. Brown, Nos. 89-5404 to 89-5407, 908 F.2d 968 (Table), 1990 WL 101946 (4th Cir. 1990). …

… Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel “as it relate[d] to the FISA Documents.” 2008 WL 5123009, at *8. … Al-Kidd v. Gonzales, No. CV 05–093–EJL–MHW, 2008 WL 5123009 (D. Idaho Dec. 4, 2008). … UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT …

… Holding that the FISA statute meets Fourth amendment constitutional requirements. 835 F.2d at 1075. The Court further found that the application for surveillance was made properly, with the primary purpose being to gather …

… The Court, reviewing FISA applications and supporting materials de novo, found there was probable cause to believe defendant was an agent of a foreign power. 381 F.3d at 332. View document: …

… Citizen brought an action seeking an injunction to prohibit the NSA from collecting her telephone metadata, and the NSA moved to dismiss. 24 F. Supp. 3d at 1006. The Court held that Smith v. Maryland still applied (no …

… Held that Bivens remedy did not extend to investigative reporter and her family members’ Fourth Amendment claims against Attorney General and Postmaster General and that the AG and Postmaster General were entitled to …

… The district court erred in denying the law firm's motion seeking to enjoin the government's use of a filter team comprised of federal agents and prosecutors to inspect privileged attorney-client materials that were seized …