Search Full Text

… “Because the FISA surveillance was not illegal, this Court need not consider the parties' arguments as to whether the illegality of FISA surveillance may serve as a defense to contempt in a grand jury proceeding.” 347 F.3d …

… Rejecting defendant’s argument that “evidence gathered under FISA cannot be used in domestic criminal investigations or prosecutions.” 477 F.3d at 897. Because “FISA requires each intercept to be authorized by a warrant,” …

… Finding that “the district court did not err when it denied the defendants’ motion to suppress” FISA obtained evidence. 529 F.3d at 993. View document: https://perma.cc/QAN2-A9B7 … United States v. Campa, 529 F.3d 980 …

… Trial judge “failed to make[] the additional determination, based on full access to all classified materials and the defense's proffer of its version of events, of whether it's possible to determine the validity of the …

… Finding that “FISA applications [were] free of any procedural defects.” 761 F. 3d at 681. Finding that “FISA applications contain ample evidence to support a finding of probable cause.” Id. View document: …

… Affirming “order of the district court denying suppression of the FISA evidence and its evidentiary fruits.” 840 F. 3d at 343. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13937278411929636062&q=840… … …

… Finding that disclosure of FISA materials to defendant was “not ‘necessary’ to assess the legality of the searches or surveillance.” 868 F.3d at 955. Defendant’s “confrontation rights were not violated [] simply because …

… Denying disclosure of FISA-related materials. See 531 F. Supp. 2d at 838–39. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=971601617375688086&q=531+F… … United States v. Amawi, 531 F. Supp. 2d 832 (N.D. Ohio …

… Denying defendant’s request for disclosure of FISA material. 339 F. Supp. 3d at 737. Defendants are “not entitled to suppression of evidence obtained or derived from surveillance and physical searches conducted under FISA …

… Denying defendant’s “Pretrial Motion for Disclosure of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)–Related Material and [Motion] to Suppress the Fruits or Derivatives of Electronic Surveillance.” 2018 WL 1033272, at *1 … …

… Defendant argued that the evidence should be suppressed on the grounds that the surveillance was imposed not to seek foreign intelligence information, but to conduct a criminal investigation. 827 F.2d at 1462. The Court …