Search Full Text
Now showing items 1 - 10 of 10
… Finding “no abuse of discretion in the district court's conclusion that disclosing the FISA materials to [defendant] was not necessary.” 786 F.3d at 1112. View document: …
… [Section II.C discusses the constitutionality of FISA, whether FISA-obtained evidence needs to be disclosed to defendants, whether FISA's in camera, ex parte procedure violates defendants’ right to due process, and the …
… [Section A of opinion discusses constitutionality of FISA] View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7493596004227221328&q=634+… ] … Matter of Kevork, 634 F. Supp. 1002 (C.D. Cal. 1985). … Matter of …
… “FISA is constitutional both on its face and in its application to this case.” 1985 WL 5970, at *2. FISA survives defendant’s Fourth Amendment challenge. Id. … United States v. Hovsepian, No. CR 82–917 MRP, 1985 WL 5970 …
… Denying defendant’s motion “to compel production of the FISA applications, orders, and related material” and “suppression of all information obtained from the FISA surveillance.” 2006 WL 8436820, at *1. … United States v. …
… Denying “defendants' motion for declassification and for a continuance” and also denying “defendants' alternative requests for sanctions that would prevent the government from using some or all previously classified FISA …
… Denying defendants' “motion to compel production of FISA applications” and related materials. 2007 WL 2011319, at *7. … United States v. Holy Land Found. for Relief and Dev., No. 3:04-CR-240-G, 2007 WL 2011319 (N.D. Tex. …
… Denying motion in criminal material support prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B to suppress and disclose FISA-related material. … United States v. Rahim, No. 3:17-CR-0169-B, 2019 WL 1595682 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2019). … …
… The Court found the “district court did not err in concluding probable cause existed to believe [defendant] was agent of a foreign power and that each of the places where the electronic surveillance was conducted was being …
… The Court found that the FBI conducted an adequate FOIA search and properly provided a Glomar response to the petitioner’s request for disclosure of her status on a watchlist. 2020 WL 7345678, at 5. The Court further held …