Search Full Text

… “Because the FISA surveillance was not illegal, this Court need not consider the parties' arguments as to whether the illegality of FISA surveillance may serve as a defense to contempt in a grand jury proceeding.” 347 F.3d …

… Rejecting defendant’s argument that “evidence gathered under FISA cannot be used in domestic criminal investigations or prosecutions.” 477 F.3d at 897. Because “FISA requires each intercept to be authorized by a warrant,” …

… Trial judge “failed to make[] the additional determination, based on full access to all classified materials and the defense's proffer of its version of events, of whether it's possible to determine the validity of the …

… Finding that “FISA applications [were] free of any procedural defects.” 761 F. 3d at 681. Finding that “FISA applications contain ample evidence to support a finding of probable cause.” Id. View document: …

… Finding “no abuse of discretion in the district court's conclusion that disclosing the FISA materials to [defendant] was not necessary.” 786 F.3d at 1112. View document: …

… [Section II.C discusses the constitutionality of FISA, whether FISA-obtained evidence needs to be disclosed to defendants, whether FISA's in camera, ex parte procedure violates defendants’ right to due process, and the …

… Affirming “order of the district court denying suppression of the FISA evidence and its evidentiary fruits.” 840 F. 3d at 343. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13937278411929636062&q=840… … …

… Denying defendant’s “motion for new trial based upon the alleged violation of FISA and CIPA.” 2013 WL 6079518, at *9. … United States v. Moalin, No. 10cr4246 JM, 2013 WL 6079518 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2013). … 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …

… Denying defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to the FISA Wiretap. 2014 WL 1682845, at *1. … United States v. Hussein, No. 13CR1514–JM, 2014 WL 1682845 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2014). … 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …

… The Court found the “district court did not err in concluding probable cause existed to believe [defendant] was agent of a foreign power and that each of the places where the electronic surveillance was conducted was being …