Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Tunheim, John R. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2008-04-17 )

… “The fact that the government has included misstatements and critical omissions in other FISA applications not at issue here cannot justify disclosure in this case. Without some indication that the congressionally mandated …

Davis, Michael J. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2012-01-18 )

… Denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to FISA. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 888. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10414221597771304627&q=838… … United States v. Mahamud, 838 F. …

Ericksen, Joan N. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2004-09-30 )

… Granting the DOJ and the FBI’s motion “that they are entitled to judgment on the pleadings on [defendant’s] FISA claim because they are not ‘persons’ against whom FISA's civil liability provision provides a cause of …

Davis, Michael J. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2012-06-20 )

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …

Date Created

Date Issued