Search Full Text
Now showing items 1 - 11 of 11
… Rejecting “Appellants’ contention that the FISA surveillance was illegal” and denying “Appellants’ request for disclosure of the FISA materials.” 221 F.3d at 554. View document: https://perma.cc/A43E-LQJ8 … United States …
… “FISA contains both a notice clause as well as an exclusionary procedure for illegally seized electronic surveillance” but “[t]he telling absence of grand juries from Section 1806(c) allows the government to introduce FISA …
… Affirming the district court’s decision to deny defendants’ “motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to warrants issued under [FISA].” 896 F.3d at 297. View document: …
… Denying disclosure of FISA-related materials. See 531 F. Supp. 2d at 838–39. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=971601617375688086&q=531+F… … United States v. Amawi, 531 F. Supp. 2d 832 (N.D. Ohio …
… Denying defendant’s request for disclosure of FISA material. 339 F. Supp. 3d at 737. Defendants are “not entitled to suppression of evidence obtained or derived from surveillance and physical searches conducted under FISA …
… Finding that “the lower court property denied the motion for discovery” of FISA applications. 1990 WL 101946, at *3. … United States v. Brown, Nos. 89-5404 to 89-5407, 908 F.2d 968 (Table), 1990 WL 101946 (4th Cir. 1990). …
… Denying defendant’s “Pretrial Motion for Disclosure of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)–Related Material and [Motion] to Suppress the Fruits or Derivatives of Electronic Surveillance.” 2018 WL 1033272, at *1 … …
… Holding that the FISA statute meets Fourth amendment constitutional requirements. 835 F.2d at 1075. The Court further found that the application for surveillance was made properly, with the primary purpose being to gather …
… The Court, reviewing FISA applications and supporting materials de novo, found there was probable cause to believe defendant was an agent of a foreign power. 381 F.3d at 332. View document: …
… Held that Bivens remedy did not extend to investigative reporter and her family members’ Fourth Amendment claims against Attorney General and Postmaster General and that the AG and Postmaster General were entitled to …
… The district court erred in denying the law firm's motion seeking to enjoin the government's use of a filter team comprised of federal agents and prosecutors to inspect privileged attorney-client materials that were seized …