Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 8 of 8

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2010-01-08 )

… Order granting enlargement of time for [redacted] to file a petition challenging [redacted] protection order. … Order Granting Enlargement of Time, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order …

Bates, John D. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2010-01-08 )

… Order unsealing orders and opinions for various dockets for the limited purpose set forth in government's [redacted] motion. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

Walton, Reggie B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2009-12-16 )

… Primary order granting application pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 1861 of call detail records or "telephony metadata" created by [redacted]. … Primary Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order …

… Motion to Unseal Records, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the Prod. of Tangible Things from [REDACTED], No. BR 09-19 (FISA Ct. Jan. 7, 2010). … Approved for public release …

… Joint Motion for Enlargement of Time, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the Prod. of Tangible Things from [REDACTED], No. BR 09-19 (FISA Ct. Jan. 8, 2010). … Approved for …

… Motion for Amended Secondary Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the Prod. of Tangible Things from [REDACTED], No. BR 09-19 (FISA Ct. Jan. 11, 2010). … Approved for public …

Cacheris, James C. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 1997-02-03 )

… Denying defendant’s motion that judge recuse himself because judge was “a member of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (‘FISA Court’).” 955 F. Supp. at 583. View document: …

Cacheris, James C. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 1997-02-14 )

… “FISA Satisfies the Requirements of the Fourth Amendment.” 955 F. Supp. at 590. “FISA Violates neither the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment nor the Right to Counsel Provided by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. at 592. …

Date Created

Date Issued