Search Full Text
Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.
Now showing items 1 - 3 of 3
… Denying “defendant’s motion to suppress, motion for disclosure of FISA applications and orders.” 531 F. Supp. 2d at 313. “FISA, as amended . . . is constitutional under the 4th amendment.” Id. “FISA surveillance in this …
… Defendant’s “sixth amendment rights were not violated by counsel's inability to discuss the FISA materials.” 2010 WL 5776532, at *3. … United States v. Jamal, Nos. CIV 09–0332–PHX–FJM (DKD), CR 03–0261–1–PHX–FJM, 2010 WL …
… The Court found that the district court’s ex parte in camera review determining the legality of the surveillance and not requiring disclosure to defendant was in keeping with the enacted FISA procedures. 692 F.2d at 147. …