Search Full Text
Now showing items 1 - 10 of 10
… Primary order granting application pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 1861 of call detail records or "telephony metadata" created by [redacted]. … Primary Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order …
… Report of the United States, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the Prod. of Tangible Things From [REDACTED], No. BR 09-09 (FISA Ct. Aug. 17, 2009). … TOP …
… Affidavit of James B. Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. July 28, 2014). … All redacted information exempt under (b)(1), (b)(3), and …
… Affidavit of Richard H. Ledgett, Jr., Acting Director, National Security Agency, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. July 28, 2014). … All redacted information exempt under (b)(1) and/or …
… Certification of the Director of National Intelligence and the Attorney General Pursuant to Subsection 702(g) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification …
… Certification of the Director of National Intelligence and the Attorney General Pursuant to Subsection 702(g) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification …
… Affidavit of James B. Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. Sept. 26, 2016). … All withheld information exempt under (b)(1) and (b)(3) unless …
… Affidavit of the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. Sept. 26, 2016). … All withheld information exempt under (b)(1) and (b)(3) unless …
… Affidavit of Admiral Michael S. Rogers, United States Navy, Director, National Security Agency, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. Sept. 26, 2016). … All withheld information exempt under …
… Rejecting “contentions raised by [defendant and denying] each of his motions . . . challenging such investigatory procedures. This action thus confirms the denial of the motions to suppress . . . already provisionally …