Search Full Text
Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.
Now showing items 1 - 3 of 3
… Denying defendants’ “motions to suppress the FISA interceptions.” 861 F. Supp. at 253. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=958433614015386942&q=861+F… … United States v. Rahman, 861 F. Supp. 247 …
… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …
… The Court found that the district court’s ex parte in camera review determining the legality of the surveillance and not requiring disclosure to defendant was in keeping with the enacted FISA procedures. 692 F.2d at 147. …