Search Full Text
Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.
Now showing items 1 - 3 of 3
… Finding that “the district court did not err in denying Mohamud's motion to suppress premised on the late supplemental FISA notice” because defendant couldn’t “demonstrate how the late disclosure prejudiced him.” 843 F.3d …
… Reaffirming that “FISA is facially constitutional, that its requirements were met in this case, and that defendant has not made the requisite showing to warrant discovery of the FISA applications and orders.” 2012 WL …
… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …