Search Full Text

… Denying defendants’ “motions to suppress the FISA interceptions.” 861 F. Supp. at 253. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=958433614015386942&q=861+F… … United States v. Rahman, 861 F. Supp. 247 …

… “FISA preempts or displaces the state secrets privilege” in this case. 564 F. Supp. 2d. at 1124. “To proceed with their FISA claim, plaintiffs must present to the court enough specifics based on non-classified evidence to …

… Finding that “plaintiffs [] alleged enough to plead “aggrieved person” status so as to proceed to the next step in proceedings under [FISA].” 595 F. Supp. 2d at 1086. View document: …

… Finding that “section 803 [of the FISA Amendments Act] does not violate the Tenth Amendment.” 630 F. Supp. 2d at 1102. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2074081794773837532&q=630+… … In re NSA …

… Denying “Defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained by the government pursuant to FISA.” 2014 WL 4804215, at *5. … United States v. Fishenko, No. 12 CV 626(SJ), 2014 WL 4804215 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2014). … UNITED …