Search Full Text
Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.
Now showing items 1 - 3 of 3
… “Because the FISA surveillance was not illegal, this Court need not consider the parties' arguments as to whether the illegality of FISA surveillance may serve as a defense to contempt in a grand jury proceeding.” 347 F.3d …
… Defendant’s “sixth amendment rights were not violated by counsel's inability to discuss the FISA materials.” 2010 WL 5776532, at *3. … United States v. Jamal, Nos. CIV 09–0332–PHX–FJM (DKD), CR 03–0261–1–PHX–FJM, 2010 WL …
… Denying defendant’s “Motion to Suppress and for Disclosure of FISA Materials.” 2018 WL 5777025, at *1. … United States v. Chi Ping Ho, 17 Cr. 779 (LAP), 2018 WL 5777025 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2018). … ltmJCSDNY • , . 1 DOCUMENT …