Search Full Text

… The court agreed with the district court’s conclusion “that [the defendant] ‘continue[s] to suffer a present, on-going injury due to the government's continued retention of derivative material from the FISA seizure.’” 599 …

… Denying defendant’s request that the court “impose sanctions on the Government for the destruction of FISA evidence.” 2001 WL 30061, at *10. … United States v. Bin Laden, No. S(7) 98 CR. 1023(LBS), 2001 WL 30061 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …