Search Full Text

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… Denying defendant’s “Motion to Disclose FISA–Related Material Necessary to Litigate Motions for Discovery and for Suppression of the Fruits of FISA Activity.” 2012 WL 12952303, at *7. … United States v. Mohamud, No. …

… The Court held that claims challenging the continued collection of Smith’s metadata under § 215 were moot. 816 F.3d at 1241. However, the Court remanded other claims, including Smith’s request for the government to purge …