Search Full Text

… Affidavit of James B. Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. July 28, 2014). … All redacted information exempt under (b)(1), (b)(3), and …

… Affidavit of Richard H. Ledgett, Jr., Acting Director, National Security Agency, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. July 28, 2014). … All redacted information exempt under (b)(1) and/or …

… Certification of the Director of National Intelligence and the Attorney General Pursuant to Subsection 702(g) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification …

… Certification of the Director of National Intelligence and the Attorney General Pursuant to Subsection 702(g) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as Amended, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification …

… Affidavit of James B. Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. Sept. 26, 2016). … All withheld information exempt under (b)(1) and (b)(3) unless …

… Affidavit of the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. Sept. 26, 2016). … All withheld information exempt under (b)(1) and (b)(3) unless …

… Affidavit of Admiral Michael S. Rogers, United States Navy, Director, National Security Agency, [REDACTED], No. DNI/AG 702(g) Certification [REDACTED] (FISA Ct. Sept. 26, 2016). … All withheld information exempt under …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… The district court erred in denying the law firm's motion seeking to enjoin the government's use of a filter team comprised of federal agents and prosecutors to inspect privileged attorney-client materials that were seized …