Search Full Text

… Finding that “the district court did not err in denying Mohamud's motion to suppress premised on the late supplemental FISA notice” because defendant couldn’t “demonstrate how the late disclosure prejudiced him.” 843 F.3d …

… Denying defendant’s request that the court “impose sanctions on the Government for the destruction of FISA evidence.” 2001 WL 30061, at *10. … United States v. Bin Laden, No. S(7) 98 CR. 1023(LBS), 2001 WL 30061 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …