Search Full Text

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… The Court granted the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing. 2019 WL 426482, at *1. The government has shown by preponderance that it did not engage in dragnet-type activity through the PRISM program. Id. …

… In ongoing litigation relating to 2013 FOIA requests, the ACLU challenged the adequacy of the searches conducted by the CIA, FBI, and NSD. The Court found that the agencies did not meet the burden to prove adequacy of …