Search Full Text

… Granting the application for bulk telephony metadata collection, holding that “ _Smith v. Maryland_ compels the conclusion that there is no Fourth Amendment impediment to the collection,” comparing §215 to the Stored …

… Order directing the government to conduct a declassification review of the Court’s Opinion and Order in this matter, and setting a deadline for the government to establish a timeline for the review. … Order, In re …

… Ordering an Amended Memorandum Opinion to fix footnote numbering in original Opinion. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring Production of Tangible Things from [REDACTED], …

… Order establishing that after a declassification review of the Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court has determined the opinion and related orders, as redacted, are suitable for publication, and ordering the Opinion and …

… Order declining to treat the Center for National Security Studies’ letter as a Motion, and allowing the Center to re-submit its requests in the form of a Motion that complies with FISC rules. … Order, In re Application of …

… Center for National Security Studies Letter, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring Production of Tangible Things from [REDACTED], No. BR 13-109 (FISA Ct. Sept. 26, 2013). … Center …

… Motion to Establish a Public Briefing Schedule Including the Filings of Briefs by Amici Curiae, for Leave for the Center for National Security Studies to File an Amicus Brief, and a Suggestion for Hearing En Banc, In re …

… Concluding “disclosure of the FISA materials to defendants not warranted in this case.” 447 F. Supp. 2d at 547. “FISC had ample probable cause to believe that the targets were agents of a foreign power quite apart from …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …