Search Full Text

… Granting the application for bulk telephony metadata collection, holding that “ _Smith v. Maryland_ compels the conclusion that there is no Fourth Amendment impediment to the collection,” comparing §215 to the Stored …

… Order directing the government to conduct a declassification review of the Court’s Opinion and Order in this matter, and setting a deadline for the government to establish a timeline for the review. … Order, In re …

… Ordering an Amended Memorandum Opinion to fix footnote numbering in original Opinion. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring Production of Tangible Things from [REDACTED], …

… Order establishing that after a declassification review of the Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court has determined the opinion and related orders, as redacted, are suitable for publication, and ordering the Opinion and …

… Order declining to treat the Center for National Security Studies’ letter as a Motion, and allowing the Center to re-submit its requests in the form of a Motion that complies with FISC rules. … Order, In re Application of …

… Center for National Security Studies Letter, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring Production of Tangible Things from [REDACTED], No. BR 13-109 (FISA Ct. Sept. 26, 2013). … Center …

… Motion to Establish a Public Briefing Schedule Including the Filings of Briefs by Amici Curiae, for Leave for the Center for National Security Studies to File an Amicus Brief, and a Suggestion for Hearing En Banc, In re …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… Denying motioned for a new trial “because admitting evidence obtained under [FISA] violated the Fourth Amendment.” 2012 WL 3779107, at *2. Defendant also alleged FISA was unconstitutional. Id. Court rejected these …