Search Full Text

… Holding that “the FISA application established probable cause to believe that Global Relief and the executive director were agents of a foreign power, as that term is defined for FISA purposes, at the time the search was …

… Finding that the “lack of FISA procedures for physical searches” did not “render the physical search [in this case] unreasonable.” 435 F. Supp. 2d at 792. View document: …

… “FISA does not specifically prohibit surveillance and search of United States persons.” 15 F. Supp. at 1139. “FISA allows the use of evidence derived from FISA surveillance and searches in criminal prosecutions.” Id. at …

… Denying “defendants' motion for declassification and for a continuance” and also denying “defendants' alternative requests for sanctions that would prevent the government from using some or all previously classified FISA …

… Denying defendants' “motion to compel production of FISA applications” and related materials. 2007 WL 2011319, at *7. … United States v. Holy Land Found. for Relief and Dev., No. 3:04-CR-240-G, 2007 WL 2011319 (N.D. Tex. …

… “FISA electronic surveillance at issue was lawfully authorized and legally conducted.” 2010 WL 4705159, at *2. “Because disclosure of the materials is unnecessary for the Court to determine the legality of the collection, …

… Denying motioned for a new trial “because admitting evidence obtained under [FISA] violated the Fourth Amendment.” 2012 WL 3779107, at *2. Defendant also alleged FISA was unconstitutional. Id. Court rejected these …

… Denying motion in criminal material support prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B to suppress and disclose FISA-related material. … United States v. Rahim, No. 3:17-CR-0169-B, 2019 WL 1595682 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2019). … …

… After receiving notice pursuant to 50 U.S.C. §§ 1806(c) and 1825(d) that the Government would offer into evidence information derived from FISA surveillance, the defendant moved to disclose FISA-related materials. The …

… The Court found that the FBI conducted an adequate FOIA search and properly provided a Glomar response to the petitioner’s request for disclosure of her status on a watchlist. 2020 WL 7345678, at 5. The Court further held …