Search Full Text

… Holding that “the FISA application established probable cause to believe that Global Relief and the executive director were agents of a foreign power, as that term is defined for FISA purposes, at the time the search was …

… Finding that the “lack of FISA procedures for physical searches” did not “render the physical search [in this case] unreasonable.” 435 F. Supp. 2d at 792. View document: …

… Denying “defendants' motion for declassification and for a continuance” and also denying “defendants' alternative requests for sanctions that would prevent the government from using some or all previously classified FISA …

… Denying defendants' “motion to compel production of FISA applications” and related materials. 2007 WL 2011319, at *7. … United States v. Holy Land Found. for Relief and Dev., No. 3:04-CR-240-G, 2007 WL 2011319 (N.D. Tex. …

… Denying Defendants’ Motion to Obtain Disclosure of and Suppress Electronic Surveillance Evidence Obtained pursuant to FISA. 2009 WL 5169536, at *8. … United States v. Islamic Am. Relief Agency, No. 0700087-CR-W-NKL, 2009 …

… “FISA electronic surveillance at issue was lawfully authorized and legally conducted.” 2010 WL 4705159, at *2. “Because disclosure of the materials is unnecessary for the Court to determine the legality of the collection, …

… Denying motioned for a new trial “because admitting evidence obtained under [FISA] violated the Fourth Amendment.” 2012 WL 3779107, at *2. Defendant also alleged FISA was unconstitutional. Id. Court rejected these …

… Denying motion in criminal material support prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B to suppress and disclose FISA-related material. … United States v. Rahim, No. 3:17-CR-0169-B, 2019 WL 1595682 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2019). … …

… After receiving notice pursuant to 50 U.S.C. §§ 1806(c) and 1825(d) that the Government would offer into evidence information derived from FISA surveillance, the defendant moved to disclose FISA-related materials. The …

… The Court found that the FBI conducted an adequate FOIA search and properly provided a Glomar response to the petitioner’s request for disclosure of her status on a watchlist. 2020 WL 7345678, at 5. The Court further held …