Search Full Text
Now showing items 1 - 7 of 7
… Denying defendant’s motion for disclosure of FISA materials. 521 F. Supp. 2d at 130. Minimization procedures required by FISA do not apply to defendants who are not “unconsenting United States persons” and thus do not …
… “While defendants correctly point out that FISA provides for a different probable cause standard than Title III, the difference is not unconstitutional.” 793 F. Supp. 2d at 759. “FISA materials will not be disclosed.” Id. …
… Denying defendant’s “motions seeking discovery of [FISA] materials.” 1990 WL 78522, at *1. … United States v. Johnson, No. 89–221–MA, 1990 WL 78522 (D. Mass. Apr. 13, 1990). … UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF …
… Denying “defendant's Motions to Suppress Illegally Obtained FISA Evidence.” 2011 WL 3652524, at *2. … United States v. Mehanna, No. 09–10017–GAO, 2011 WL 3652524 (D. Mass. Aug. 19, 2011). … Case 1:09-cr-10017-GAO Document …
… Denying defendant’s “motion for new trial based upon the alleged violation of FISA and CIPA.” 2013 WL 6079518, at *9. … United States v. Moalin, No. 10cr4246 JM, 2013 WL 6079518 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2013). … 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …
… Denying defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to the FISA Wiretap. 2014 WL 1682845, at *1. … United States v. Hussein, No. 13CR1514–JM, 2014 WL 1682845 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2014). … 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …
… Rejecting “contentions raised by [defendant and denying] each of his motions . . . challenging such investigatory procedures. This action thus confirms the denial of the motions to suppress . . . already provisionally …