Search Full Text

… [Section A of opinion discusses constitutionality of FISA] View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7493596004227221328&q=634+… ] … Matter of Kevork, 634 F. Supp. 1002 (C.D. Cal. 1985). … Matter of …

… Denying defendants’ motion for discovery of FISA materials. 720 F. Supp. at 60. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5139066194052175054&q=720+… … United States v. Spanjol, 720 F. Supp. 55 (E.D. Pa. …

… “The fact that the government has included misstatements and critical omissions in other FISA applications not at issue here cannot justify disclosure in this case. Without some indication that the congressionally mandated …

… Denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to FISA. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 888. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10414221597771304627&q=838… … United States v. Mahamud, 838 F. …

… Rejecting “Defendant's apparent contention that FISA's ex parte provisions are per se unlawful.” 201 F. Supp. 3d at 650. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12233383397783409140&q=201… … United …

… “FISA is constitutional both on its face and in its application to this case.” 1985 WL 5970, at *2. FISA survives defendant’s Fourth Amendment challenge. Id. … United States v. Hovsepian, No. CR 82–917 MRP, 1985 WL 5970 …

… Granting the DOJ and the FBI’s motion “that they are entitled to judgment on the pleadings on [defendant’s] FISA claim because they are not ‘persons’ against whom FISA's civil liability provision provides a cause of …

… Denying defendant’s motion “to compel production of the FISA applications, orders, and related material” and “suppression of all information obtained from the FISA surveillance.” 2006 WL 8436820, at *1. … United States v. …

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …

… After the indictment of Professor Xiaoxing Xi was dismissed which had accused him of being a “technological spy” for China, Xi asserted a claim against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for an unfounded …