Search Full Text

… Finding that “the district court did not err when it denied the defendants’ motion to suppress” FISA obtained evidence. 529 F.3d at 993. View document: https://perma.cc/QAN2-A9B7 … United States v. Campa, 529 F.3d 980 …

… Finding “no abuse of discretion in the district court's conclusion that disclosing the FISA materials to [defendant] was not necessary.” 786 F.3d at 1112. View document: …

… [Section II.C discusses the constitutionality of FISA, whether FISA-obtained evidence needs to be disclosed to defendants, whether FISA's in camera, ex parte procedure violates defendants’ right to due process, and the …

… Finding that disclosure of FISA materials to defendant was “not ‘necessary’ to assess the legality of the searches or surveillance.” 868 F.3d at 955. Defendant’s “confrontation rights were not violated [] simply because …

… “The government has strictly complied with the requirements of FISA in its investigation and prosecution of this case. The court concludes that there is no basis to disclose or to suppress the FISA materials.” 228 F. Supp. …

… Defendant argued that the evidence should be suppressed on the grounds that the surveillance was imposed not to seek foreign intelligence information, but to conduct a criminal investigation. 827 F.2d at 1462. The Court …

… The Court found the “district court did not err in concluding probable cause existed to believe [defendant] was agent of a foreign power and that each of the places where the electronic surveillance was conducted was being …