Search Full Text

… “FISA's ‘significant purpose’ standard is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” 671 F.3d at 343. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9129029593834173120&q=671+… … United States v. Duka, 671 F.3d …

… “The fact that the government has included misstatements and critical omissions in other FISA applications not at issue here cannot justify disclosure in this case. Without some indication that the congressionally mandated …

… Denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to FISA. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 888. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10414221597771304627&q=838… … United States v. Mahamud, 838 F. …

… Granting the DOJ and the FBI’s motion “that they are entitled to judgment on the pleadings on [defendant’s] FISA claim because they are not ‘persons’ against whom FISA's civil liability provision provides a cause of …

… Defendant’s “sixth amendment rights were not violated by counsel's inability to discuss the FISA materials.” 2010 WL 5776532, at *3. … United States v. Jamal, Nos. CIV 09–0332–PHX–FJM (DKD), CR 03–0261–1–PHX–FJM, 2010 WL …

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Disclosure and Review of all FISA Materials, and Suppression of All FISA–Derived Evidence.” 2012 WL 2357734, at *6 … United States v. Omar, No. 09–242 (MJD/FLN), 2012 WL 2357734 (D. Minn. …