Search Full Text

… “FISA's ‘significant purpose’ standard is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” 671 F.3d at 343. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9129029593834173120&q=671+… … United States v. Duka, 671 F.3d …

… Finding “no abuse of discretion in the district court's conclusion that disclosing the FISA materials to [defendant] was not necessary.” 786 F.3d at 1112. View document: …

… [Section II.C discusses the constitutionality of FISA, whether FISA-obtained evidence needs to be disclosed to defendants, whether FISA's in camera, ex parte procedure violates defendants’ right to due process, and the …

… Denying defendants’ motion for discovery of FISA materials. 720 F. Supp. at 60. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5139066194052175054&q=720+… … United States v. Spanjol, 720 F. Supp. 55 (E.D. Pa. …

… Rejecting “Defendant's apparent contention that FISA's ex parte provisions are per se unlawful.” 201 F. Supp. 3d at 650. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12233383397783409140&q=201… … United …

… The Court found the “district court did not err in concluding probable cause existed to believe [defendant] was agent of a foreign power and that each of the places where the electronic surveillance was conducted was being …

… After the indictment of Professor Xiaoxing Xi was dismissed which had accused him of being a “technological spy” for China, Xi asserted a claim against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for an unfounded …