Search Full Text

… Finding that “the district court did not err when it denied the defendants’ motion to suppress” FISA obtained evidence. 529 F.3d at 993. View document: https://perma.cc/QAN2-A9B7 … United States v. Campa, 529 F.3d 980 …

… Finding that disclosure of FISA materials to defendant was “not ‘necessary’ to assess the legality of the searches or surveillance.” 868 F.3d at 955. Defendant’s “confrontation rights were not violated [] simply because …

… [Section A of opinion discusses constitutionality of FISA] View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7493596004227221328&q=634+… ] … Matter of Kevork, 634 F. Supp. 1002 (C.D. Cal. 1985). … Matter of …

… “The government has strictly complied with the requirements of FISA in its investigation and prosecution of this case. The court concludes that there is no basis to disclose or to suppress the FISA materials.” 228 F. Supp. …

… “FISA is constitutional both on its face and in its application to this case.” 1985 WL 5970, at *2. FISA survives defendant’s Fourth Amendment challenge. Id. … United States v. Hovsepian, No. CR 82–917 MRP, 1985 WL 5970 …

… Denying defendant’s motion “to compel production of the FISA applications, orders, and related material” and “suppression of all information obtained from the FISA surveillance.” 2006 WL 8436820, at *1. … United States v. …

… Defendant argued that the evidence should be suppressed on the grounds that the surveillance was imposed not to seek foreign intelligence information, but to conduct a criminal investigation. 827 F.2d at 1462. The Court …