Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … Order authorizing the government installation and use of pen register and trap and trace devices, with no geographic limits or restrictions within the United States. … Order, [REDACTED], No. REDACTED, …

… Directing the government to destroy information obtained by unauthorized electronic surveillance. … Opinion and Order Requiring Destruction of Information Obtained by Unauthorized Electronic Surveillance, [REDACTED], Nos. …

… Ordering the government to submit further information regarding its proposed retention and use of the results of unauthorized surveillance. … Opinion and Order Regarding Fruits of Unauthorized Electronic Surveillance, …

… Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

… ACLU v. FBI, No. 11cv7562, 2015 WL 1566775 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2015) … USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC#: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - …

… Concluding that “the Government may withhold the documents listed on its Vaughn index and any further information about them, under Exemptions 1 and 3 of FOIA.” 2015 WL 1566775, at *4. … ACLU v. FBI, No. 11cv7562, 2015 WL …

… The Court ordered the movant, ACLU, to show cause why the FISCR has authority to entertain a petition for review, seeking an appeal to the order in GID.C.000285 dismissing their motion for records for lack of jurisdiction, …

… FOIA request for classified § 215 report was denied based on Exemption 1 and 3. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 313, 315-17. After an in camera review, the Court found that the Exemptions applied and that there was no secret laws …

… The Court declined to entertain the ACLU’s petition to revisit the Court’s decision in GID.CA.00013, holding that it "is unpersuaded that the Movant has shown cause as to why this Court has jurisdiction to consider its …

… ACLU brought action seeking documents related to bulk collection under Section 215. The Court found that the DOJ properly gave a Glomar response relating to the existence of bulk collection of information other than …