Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 5 of 5

Wilkinson, J. Harvie, III (United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010-02-24 )

… “FISA contains both a notice clause as well as an exclusionary procedure for illegally seized electronic surveillance” but “[t]he telling absence of grand juries from Section 1806(c) allows the government to introduce FISA …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

O'Toole, George A. (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 2011-08-19 )

… Denying “defendant's Motions to Suppress Illegally Obtained FISA Evidence.” 2011 WL 3652524, at *2. … United States v. Mehanna, No. 09–10017–GAO, 2011 WL 3652524 (D. Mass. Aug. 19, 2011). … Case 1:09-cr-10017-GAO Document …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Wilkinson, J. Harvie, III (United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1987-12-18 )

… Holding that the FISA statute meets Fourth amendment constitutional requirements. 835 F.2d at 1075. The Court further found that the application for surveillance was made properly, with the primary purpose being to gather …

Date Created

Date Issued