Search Full Text

Adding/changing search terms will clear filters.

Now showing items 1 - 4 of 4

Tunheim, John R. (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 2008-04-17 )

… “The fact that the government has included misstatements and critical omissions in other FISA applications not at issue here cannot justify disclosure in this case. Without some indication that the congressionally mandated …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2019-03-22 )

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

O'Toole, George A. (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 2011-08-19 )

… Denying “defendant's Motions to Suppress Illegally Obtained FISA Evidence.” 2011 WL 3652524, at *2. … United States v. Mehanna, No. 09–10017–GAO, 2011 WL 3652524 (D. Mass. Aug. 19, 2011). … Case 1:09-cr-10017-GAO Document …

Orrick, William H., III (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2017-12-07 )

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

Date Created

Date Issued