Search Full Text
Now showing items 1 - 10 of 10
… Date Redacted … UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Rule Page Title I. Applicability of Rules. 1. Scope of Rules …
… Date Redacted … ,M YRftl~ ltltll FM19n lntelllgence IUMHllna Court of Review MAY 03 2018 UNITED STATES ~~Hal. ClelkaOourt FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW WASHINGTON, D.C. ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF …
… In re Certified Question of Law, 858 F.3d 591 (FISA Ct. Rev. 2016) (per curiam). … Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI …
… In re: Certification of Questions of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, No. FISCR 18-01, 2018 WL 2709456 (FISA Ct. Rev. Mar. 16, 2018). (per curiam) … Flied Unlttcl ltatt1 Foreign lntetllgln• …
… Finding that “FISA preempts the common law doctrine of the state secrets privilege.” 965 F. Supp. 2d at 1105. Also finding that defendants did not “[waive] sovereign immunity to sue for damages.” See id. at 1106–07. View …
… Granting Government motion for summary judgment in FOIA suit, denying plaintiffs information about notice of FISA surveillance/definition of “derived from.” On grounds they are covered by attorney-client privilege. … ACLU …
… Denying defendant’s “motion for new trial based upon the alleged violation of FISA and CIPA.” 2013 WL 6079518, at *9. … United States v. Moalin, No. 10cr4246 JM, 2013 WL 6079518 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2013). … 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …
… Denying defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to the FISA Wiretap. 2014 WL 1682845, at *1. … United States v. Hussein, No. 13CR1514–JM, 2014 WL 1682845 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2014). … 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …
… Granting Government motion for summary judgment in FOIA suit, denying plaintiffs information about notice of FISA surveillance/definition of “derived from.” On grounds they are covered by attorney-client privilege. … ACLU …
… The Court, after extensive in camera review of the classified materials and public evidence, “finds that making any particularized determination on standing in order to continue the litigation may imperil the national …