Search Full Text

… Judicial review of telephone metadata program is not precluded by FISA. See 785 F. 3d at 805. Telephone metadata program was not authorized by text of section 215. Id. at 821. View document: …

… Held agencies did not waive right to assert Glomar responses, adequately substantiated cognizable harm under FOIA exemption, conducted adequate search, and properly redacted/withheld information and determining in camera …

… ACLU v. FBI, No. 11cv7562, 2015 WL 1566775 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2015) … USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC#: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - …

… Concluding that “the Government may withhold the documents listed on its Vaughn index and any further information about them, under Exemptions 1 and 3 of FOIA.” 2015 WL 1566775, at *4. … ACLU v. FBI, No. 11cv7562, 2015 WL …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to suppress” and for “disclosure of orders, applications, and related materials under [FISA];” also denying “motion for notice of and discovery about the use of surveillance pursuant to the FISA …

… FOIA request for classified § 215 report was denied based on Exemption 1 and 3. 838 F. Supp. 2d at 313, 315-17. After an in camera review, the Court found that the Exemptions applied and that there was no secret laws …

… ACLU brought action seeking documents related to bulk collection under Section 215. The Court found that the DOJ properly gave a Glomar response relating to the existence of bulk collection of information other than …

… Holding that: 1) “‘incidental collection’ of communications (that is, the collection of the communications of individuals in the United States acquired in the course of the surveillance of individuals without ties to the …