Search Full Text

… Date Redacted … UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Rule Page Title I. Applicability of Rules. 1. Scope of Rules …

… Date Redacted … ,M YRftl~ ltltll FM19n lntelllgence IUMHllna Court of Review MAY 03 2018 UNITED STATES ~~Hal. ClelkaOourt FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW WASHINGTON, D.C. ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF …

… In re Certified Question of Law, 858 F.3d 591 (FISA Ct. Rev. 2016) (per curiam). … Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI 20160818 Approved for public release by the ODNI …

… In re: Certification of Questions of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, No. FISCR 18-01, 2018 WL 2709456 (FISA Ct. Rev. Mar. 16, 2018). (per curiam) … Flied Unlttcl ltatt1 Foreign lntetllgln• …

… Finding that “FISA does not completely preempt plaintiffs' state law claims.” 483 F. Supp. 2d at 940. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12836154213984084203&q=483… … In re NSA Telecomm. Records …

… “FISA preempts or displaces the state secrets privilege” in this case. 564 F. Supp. 2d. at 1124. “To proceed with their FISA claim, plaintiffs must present to the court enough specifics based on non-classified evidence to …

… Finding that “plaintiffs [] alleged enough to plead “aggrieved person” status so as to proceed to the next step in proceedings under [FISA].” 595 F. Supp. 2d at 1086. View document: …

… Finding that “section 803 [of the FISA Amendments Act] does not violate the Tenth Amendment.” 630 F. Supp. 2d at 1102. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2074081794773837532&q=630+… … In re NSA …

… “FISA electronic surveillance at issue was lawfully authorized and legally conducted.” 2010 WL 4705159, at *2. “Because disclosure of the materials is unnecessary for the Court to determine the legality of the collection, …

… Denying motioned for a new trial “because admitting evidence obtained under [FISA] violated the Fourth Amendment.” 2012 WL 3779107, at *2. Defendant also alleged FISA was unconstitutional. Id. Court rejected these …