Search Full Text
Now showing items 1 - 6 of 6
… “Because the FISA surveillance was not illegal, this Court need not consider the parties' arguments as to whether the illegality of FISA surveillance may serve as a defense to contempt in a grand jury proceeding.” 347 F.3d …
… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …
… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …
… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …
… Intel. Cmty. Assessement, Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections, Annex A (Dec. 30, 2016) … UNCLASSIFIED DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC The Honorable Charles E. Grassley …
… Letter from John Ratcliffe, Dir. of Nat'l Intel., to Lindsey Graham, Chairman, S. Comm. on the Judiciary (Sept. 29, 2020) … UNCLASSIFIED DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC SEP 2 9 2020 The Honorable Lindsey …