Search Full Text

… Discusses extension of three FISA-related provisions: USA PATRIOT Act Section 206 (amending FISA to permit roving wiretaps); USA PATRIOT Act § 215 (tangible goods); and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act …

… Discusses controversial aspects of the USA PATRIOT Act and exploring the arguments that undergirded support for and opposition to the measures. … EDWARD C. LIU & CHARLES DOYLE, CONG. RES. SERV., R40980, GOVERNMENT …

… Describes § 215 bulk telephony metadata program and § 702 interception of Internet-based communications targeted at foreigners underseas that inadvertently acquires U.S. persons’ communications. Addresses constitutional …

… Discussing H.R. 5949 (which extended Title VII of FISA until Dec. 31, 2017), and addressing the contours of Title VII, as well as the subsequent litigation. … EDWARD C. LIU, CONG. RES. SERV., R42725, REAUTHORIZATION OF THE …

… Edward Liu discusses the use and implementation of § 702. Specifically, the scope of acquisitions, certifications procedures, exigent circumstances, and constitutional challenges. … EDWARD C. LIU, CONG. RES. SERV., R44457, …

… Finding that “FISA does not completely preempt plaintiffs' state law claims.” 483 F. Supp. 2d at 940. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12836154213984084203&q=483… … In re NSA Telecomm. Records …

… “FISA preempts or displaces the state secrets privilege” in this case. 564 F. Supp. 2d. at 1124. “To proceed with their FISA claim, plaintiffs must present to the court enough specifics based on non-classified evidence to …

… Finding that “plaintiffs [] alleged enough to plead “aggrieved person” status so as to proceed to the next step in proceedings under [FISA].” 595 F. Supp. 2d at 1086. View document: …

… Finding that “section 803 [of the FISA Amendments Act] does not violate the Tenth Amendment.” 630 F. Supp. 2d at 1102. View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2074081794773837532&q=630+… … In re NSA …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …