Search Full Text

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… Denying defendant’s “Motion to Disclose FISA–Related Material Necessary to Litigate Motions for Discovery and for Suppression of the Fruits of FISA Activity.” 2012 WL 12952303, at *7. … United States v. Mohamud, No. …

… Denying defendants’ “defendants' Motion for Discovery of Classified Materials [97], Motion to Declare Unconstitutional the Classified Information Procedures Act & Motion to Compel Disclosure of Classified Discovery [109], …

… Denying defendant’s Motion for Full Discovery Regarding the Facts and Circumstances Underlying Surveillance and Motion to Compel Immediate Production to the Court of Classified Documents Related to Pending Posttrial …

… Denying “Defendant's Motion for Vacation of Conviction and Alternative Remedies of Dismissal of the Indictment, Suppression of Evidence, and New Trial for the Government's Violation of the Pretrial Notice Statute [500], …

… The ACLU brought FOIA suit seeking § 702 materials. The Government claimed Exemptions 1, 3, and 7E, but the Court found summary claims made by ODNI, NSD, NSA, FBI were insufficient. The Court ordered in camera review …