Search Full Text

… Primary Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §§1861. … Primary Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order …

… Order granting extension of the orders issued in previous [redacted] docket, conducting electronic surveillance on call records and specific facilities described. … Order, In re [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00013 …

… Order granting electronic surveillance targeting redacted agents engaged in international terrorism or activities in preparation therefor pursuant to 50 U.S.C. §1801-1811. … Order, In re Various Known and Unknown Agents of …

… Order granting electronic surveillance for collection communications with probable cause to believe [redacted] pursuant to 50 U.S.C. §1801-1811. … Order, In re [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00009 (FISA Ct. Jan. 10, …

… Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

… Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

… Begins on FSC 109 of GID.C.00241 … Order granting the government’s motion to unseal the government’s Motion to Compel Compliance, Yahoo’s Memo in Opposition to Compel, Memo in Support of the Motion to Compel, and Yahoo’s …

… Denying defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of any ongoing surveillance pursuant to Title III or FISA is denied.” 2002 WL 1836755, at *7. … United States v. Abdel Sattar, No. 02 Cr. 395(JGK), 2002 WL 1836755 (S.D.N.Y. …

… Denying “[a]ll of the defendant’s motions to suppress the fruits of the FISA evidence” 2003 WL 22137012 at *22. Finding that “the FISA surveillance was lawfully authorized and executed.” Id. … United States v. Abdel …

… Denying defendant’s motion for evidentiary hearing “on both ‘government noncompliance with discovery obligations, principally concerning electronic surveillance evidence,’ and the ‘admissibility of electronic surveillance …

… The Court found that the district court’s ex parte in camera review determining the legality of the surveillance and not requiring disclosure to defendant was in keeping with the enacted FISA procedures. 692 F.2d at 147. …