Search Full Text

… Primary Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §§1861. … Primary Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order …

… Order granting extension of the orders issued in previous [redacted] docket, conducting electronic surveillance on call records and specific facilities described. … Order, In re [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00013 …

… Order granting electronic surveillance targeting redacted agents engaged in international terrorism or activities in preparation therefor pursuant to 50 U.S.C. §1801-1811. … Order, In re Various Known and Unknown Agents of …

… Order granting electronic surveillance for collection communications with probable cause to believe [redacted] pursuant to 50 U.S.C. §1801-1811. … Order, In re [REDACTED], No. [REDACTED], GID.C.00009 (FISA Ct. Jan. 10, …

… Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

… Order granting requiring production of call detail records or "telephony metadata" of [redacted] pursuant to U.S. §1861. … Order, In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the …

… Begins on FSC 109 of GID.C.00241 … Order granting the government’s motion to unseal the government’s Motion to Compel Compliance, Yahoo’s Memo in Opposition to Compel, Memo in Support of the Motion to Compel, and Yahoo’s …

… Denying defendant’s request for disclosure of FISA material. 339 F. Supp. 3d at 737. Defendants are “not entitled to suppression of evidence obtained or derived from surveillance and physical searches conducted under FISA …

… “FISA electronic surveillance at issue was lawfully authorized and legally conducted.” 2010 WL 4705159, at *2. “Because disclosure of the materials is unnecessary for the Court to determine the legality of the collection, …

… Denying motioned for a new trial “because admitting evidence obtained under [FISA] violated the Fourth Amendment.” 2012 WL 3779107, at *2. Defendant also alleged FISA was unconstitutional. Id. Court rejected these …